ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT225
Utility
- power
- 23.3 hp
- displacement
- 68.5 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT225 vs Challenger MT445
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT445
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 258 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
ChallengerChallenger MT225
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT445
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ MT445 higher · +190 ci (+277%)MT22568.5 ci
MT445258 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT225 is in the 8th percentile; MT445 is in the 73rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MT445 higher · +1 (+33%)MT2253
MT4454
Median Utility Tractor4
MT225 is in the 23rd percentile; MT445 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT445 higher · +4,539 lb (+271%)MT2251,672 lb
MT4456,211 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
MT225 is in the 8th percentile; MT445 is in the 59th · 5,107 models
Length
▲ MT445 higher · +58 in (+55%)MT225105 in
MT445163 in
Median Utility Tractor137 in
MT225 is in the 12th percentile; MT445 is in the 81st · 4,659 models
MT225 (A)MT445 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Challenger MT445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | MT225 | MT445 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Challenger MT445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Perkins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3054B | — |
| Power Output | 23.3hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,800RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ MT225+600 RPM · +27% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ MT445+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 68.5ci | 258ci | ▲ MT445+190 ci · +277% |
| Bore | 3.1in | 4.1in | ▲ MT445+1 in · +32% |
| Stroke | 3.1in | 5in | ▲ MT445+1.9 in · +61% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Challenger MT445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Power Shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Challenger MT445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 105in | 163in | ▲ MT445+58 in · +55% |
| Width | 41in | 77in | ▲ MT445+36 in · +88% |
| Height | 75.2in | 103in | ▲ MT445+27.8 in · +37% |
| Operating Weight | 1,672lb | 6,211lb | ▲ MT445+4,539 lb · +271% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Challenger MT445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power steering | Not recorded | — |
Tread Width
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Challenger MT445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tread Width | Not recorded | 12.4in | — |
| Rear Tread | Not recorded | 13.6in | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Challenger MT445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Category 2 | — |
| Hitch Category | 1 | Category 2 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 694lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Challenger MT445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power steering | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet Disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Challenger MT445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Electric Starter | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Challenger MT445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Open (ROPS) | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 8th percentile (68.5 ci)B · 73rd percentile (258 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 8th percentile (1,672 lb)B · 59th percentile (6,211 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 12th percentile (105 in)B · 81st percentile (163 in)
Width
median 66 inA · 4th percentile (41 in)B · 75th percentile (77 in)
A · MT225B · MT445Median Utility Tractor