Head to head · Utility

Challenger MT225B vs Challenger MT255B

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT225B

Utility

power
22.5 hp
displacement
68.5 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full MT225B specs
Challenger MT255B Tractor
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT255B

Utility

power
28.4 hp
displacement
89.3 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full MT255B specs
ChallengerChallenger MT225B
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT255B

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 1,083–5,720

Engine Power

▲ MT255B higher · +5.9 hp (+26%)
MT225B22.5 hp
MT255B28.4 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

MT225B is in the 12th percentile; MT255B is in the 20th · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT255B higher · +20.8 ci (+30%)
MT225B68.5 ci
MT255B89.3 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

MT225B is in the 8th percentile; MT255B is in the 15th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT225B3
MT255B3
Median Utility Tractor4

MT225B is in the 23rd percentile; MT255B is in the 23rd · 5,720 models

Operating Weight

▲ MT255B higher · +814 lb (+51%)
MT225B1,609 lb
MT255B2,423 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb

MT225B is in the 7th percentile; MT255B is in the 15th · 5,107 models

MT225B (A)MT255B (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT255BDifference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT225BMT255B—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT255BDifference
ManufacturerIsekiIsekiSame
ModelE3312E3CF—
Power Output22.5hp28.4hp▲ MT255B+5.9 hp · +26%
Rated RPM2,600RPM2,500RPM▲ MT225B+100 RPM · +4%
Cylinders33Same
Displacement68.5ci89.3ci▲ MT255B+20.8 ci · +30%
Bore3.1in3.4in▲ MT255B+0.3 in · +10%
Stroke3.1in3.3in▲ MT255B+0.2 in · +6%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT255BDifference
TypeHydrostaticHydrostaticSame

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT255BDifference
Length102in112in▲ MT255B+10 in · +10%
Width39.4in50.6in▲ MT255B+11.2 in · +28%
Height65.5in80.7in▲ MT255B+15.2 in · +23%
Operating Weight1,609lb2,423lb▲ MT255B+814 lb · +51%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT255BDifference
System TypeOpen CenterOpen CenterSame
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerPower—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT255BDifference
Hitch TypeThree-Point Hitch3 Point Hitch—
Hitch CategoryIISame
Hitch Capacity591lb1,609lb▲ MT255B+1,018 lb · +172%

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT255BDifference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x4 MFWD 4WDSame
Drive Type4WD4WDSame
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerPower—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT255BDifference
Starter TypeNot recordedElectric—

Capacities

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT255BDifference
Coolant1.9gal1.5gal▲ MT225B+0.5 gal · +36%

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT255BDifference
TypeNot recordedOpen—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 12th percentile (22.5 hp)B · 20th percentile (28.4 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 8th percentile (68.5 ci)B · 15th percentile (89.3 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 7th percentile (1,609 lb)B · 15th percentile (2,423 lb)

Length

median 137 in
A · 10th percentile (102 in)B · 18th percentile (112 in)
A · MT225BB · MT255BMedian Utility Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT225BFull spec pageChallenger MT255B