Head to head · Utility

Challenger MT225B vs Challenger MT265B

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT225B

Utility

power
22.5 hp
displacement
68.5 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full MT225B specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT265B

Utility

power
33 hp
displacement
91.4 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
8
Full MT265B specs
ChallengerChallenger MT225B
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT265B

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 1,083–5,720

Engine Power

▲ MT265B higher · +10.5 hp (+47%)
MT225B22.5 hp
MT265B33 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

MT225B is in the 12th percentile; MT265B is in the 25th · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT265B higher · +22.9 ci (+33%)
MT225B68.5 ci
MT265B91.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

MT225B is in the 8th percentile; MT265B is in the 18th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT225B3
MT265B3
Median Utility Tractor4

MT225B is in the 23rd percentile; MT265B is in the 23rd · 5,720 models

Operating Weight

▲ MT265B higher · +1,527 lb (+95%)
MT225B1,609 lb
MT265B3,136 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb

MT225B is in the 7th percentile; MT265B is in the 25th · 5,107 models

MT225B (A)MT265B (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT265BDifference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT225BMT265B—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT265BDifference
ManufacturerIsekiIsekiSame
ModelE3312E3CD-VB40—
Power Output22.5hp33hp▲ MT265B+10.5 hp · +47%
Rated RPM2,600RPM2,600RPMSame
Cylinders33Same
Displacement68.5ci91.4ci▲ MT265B+22.9 ci · +33%
Bore3.1in3.4in▲ MT265B+0.3 in · +10%
Stroke3.1in3.3in▲ MT265B+0.2 in · +6%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT265BDifference
TypeHydrostaticSynchroShuttle—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT265BDifference
Length102in121in▲ MT265B+19 in · +19%
Width39.4in62.2in▲ MT265B+22.8 in · +58%
Height65.5in87.4in▲ MT265B+21.9 in · +33%
Operating Weight1,609lb3,136lb▲ MT265B+1,527 lb · +95%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT265BDifference
System TypeOpen CenterOpen CenterSame
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerPower—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT265BDifference
Hitch TypeThree-Point HitchCategory I—
Hitch CategoryI1—
Hitch PositionNot recordedRear—
Hitch Capacity591lb2,535lb▲ MT265B+1,944 lb · +329%

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT265BDifference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x4 MFWD 4WDSame
Drive Type4WDFour Wheel Drive (4WD)—
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerPower—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT265BDifference
Starter TypeNot recordedElectric—

Capacities

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT265BDifference
Coolant1.9gal1.8gal▲ MT225B+0.1 gal · +6%

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT265BDifference
TypeNot recordedOpen—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 12th percentile (22.5 hp)B · 25th percentile (33 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 8th percentile (68.5 ci)B · 18th percentile (91.4 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 7th percentile (1,609 lb)B · 25th percentile (3,136 lb)

Length

median 137 in
A · 10th percentile (102 in)B · 28th percentile (121 in)
A · MT225BB · MT265BMedian Utility Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT225BFull spec pageChallenger MT265B