Head to head · Utility

Challenger MT255 vs Kubota B9200

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT255

Utility

power
28.4 hp
displacement
89.3 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
9
Full MT255 specs
Image not recorded
KubotaModel B

Kubota B9200

Utility

power
22.5 hp
displacement
75.5 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
9
Full B9200 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT255
vs
KubotaKubota B9200

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 1,083–5,720

Engine Power

▲ MT255 higher · +5.9 hp (+26%)
MT25528.4 hp
B920022.5 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

MT255 is in the 20th percentile; B9200 is in the 12th · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT255 higher · +13.8 ci (+18%)
MT25589.3 ci
B920075.5 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

MT255 is in the 15th percentile; B9200 is in the 11th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

▲ B9200 higher · +1 (+33%)
MT2553
B92004
Median Utility Tractor4

MT255 is in the 23rd percentile; B9200 is in the 50th · 5,720 models

Forward Gears

= Effectively tied
MT2559
B92009
Median Utility Tractor12

MT255 is in the 35th percentile; B9200 is in the 35th · 4,941 models

MT255 (A)B9200 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT255Kubota B9200Difference
ManufacturerChallengerKubota—
ModelMT255B9200—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT255Kubota B9200Difference
ManufacturerIsekiKubota—
ModelNot recordedV1200-A—
Power Output28.4hp22.5hp▲ MT255+5.9 hp · +26%
Rated RPM2,500RPM2,500RPMSame
Cylinders34▲ B9200+1 · +33%
Displacement89.3ci75.5ci▲ MT255+13.8 ci · +18%
Bore3.4in3in▲ MT255+0.4 in · +13%
Stroke3.3in2.8in▲ MT255+0.5 in · +18%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT255Kubota B9200Difference
TypeConstant meshGear type—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT255Kubota B9200Difference
Length117in109in▲ MT255+8 in · +7%
Width51in53.5in▲ B9200+2.5 in · +5%
Height79.3in79.5in▲ B9200+0.2 in · <1%
Operating Weight2,248lb1,570lb▲ MT255+678 lb · +43%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT255Kubota B9200Difference
System TypeOpen CenterOpen centerSame
Steering TypePowerHydrostatic power—

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecChallenger MT255Kubota B9200Difference
Speed 1Not recorded540rpm—
Speed 2Not recorded748rpm—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT255Kubota B9200Difference
Hitch TypeCAT IThree-Point—
Hitch CategoryIISame
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded—
Hitch Capacity1,323lb1,280lb▲ MT255+43 lb · +3%

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT255Kubota B9200Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x2 2WD—
Drive Type4WD2WD—
Steering TypePowerHydrostatic power—
Brake TypeNot recordedDry internal expanding—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT255Kubota B9200Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Capacities

SpecChallenger MT255Kubota B9200Difference
CoolantNot recorded1gal—

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT255Kubota B9200Difference
TypeOpen, ROPSOpen station with two-post ROPS—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 20th percentile (28.4 hp)B · 12th percentile (22.5 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 15th percentile (89.3 ci)B · 11th percentile (75.5 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)

Forward Gears

median 12
A · 35th percentile (9)B · 35th percentile (9)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 14th percentile (2,248 lb)B · 7th percentile (1,570 lb)
A · MT255B · B9200Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT255Full spec pageKubota B9200