Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT255
Utility
- power
- 28.4 hp
- displacement
- 89.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 9
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT255 vs RK Tractors RK24H
Image not recorded
RK TractorsModel B
RK Tractors RK24H
Utility
- power
- 24 hp
- displacement
- 77.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT255
vs
RK TractorsRK Tractors RK24H
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT255 higher · +4.4 hp (+18%)MT25528.4 hp
RK24H24 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT255 is in the 20th percentile; RK24H is in the 14th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT255 higher · +12 ci (+16%)MT25589.3 ci
RK24H77.3 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT255 is in the 15th percentile; RK24H is in the 11th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT2553
RK24H3
Median Utility Tractor4
MT255 is in the 23rd percentile; RK24H is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT255 higher · +638 lb (+40%)MT2552,248 lb
RK24H1,610 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
MT255 is in the 14th percentile; RK24H is in the 8th · 5,107 models
MT255 (A)RK24H (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | RK Tractors RK24H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | RK Tractors | — |
| Model | MT255 | RK24H | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility, Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | RK Tractors RK24H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Yanmar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3TNV80F | — |
| Power Output | 28.4hp | 24hp | ▲ MT255+4.4 hp · +18% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 3,000RPM | ▲ RK24H+500 RPM · +20% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 89.3ci | 77.3ci | ▲ MT255+12 ci · +16% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 3.2in | ▲ MT255+0.3 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 3.3in | 3.3in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | RK Tractors RK24H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Constant mesh | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | RK Tractors RK24H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 117in | 100in | ▲ MT255+17 in · +17% |
| Width | 51in | 45.7in | ▲ MT255+5.3 in · +12% |
| Height | 79.3in | 90.9in | ▲ RK24H+11.6 in · +15% |
| Operating Weight | 2,248lb | 1,610lb | ▲ MT255+638 lb · +40% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | RK Tractors RK24H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | RK Tractors RK24H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Independent with electro-hydraulic clutch | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 2,000rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | RK Tractors RK24H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | CAT I | Category I | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,323lb | 1,325lb | ▲ RK24H+2 lb · <1% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | RK Tractors RK24H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | RK Tractors RK24H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | RK Tractors RK24H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open, ROPS | Two-post ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 20th percentile (28.4 hp)B · 14th percentile (24 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 15th percentile (89.3 ci)B · 11th percentile (77.3 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 14th percentile (2,248 lb)B · 8th percentile (1,610 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 23rd percentile (117 in)B · 9th percentile (100 in)
A · MT255B · RK24HMedian Utility Tractor