ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT255B
Utility
- power
- 28.4 hp
- displacement
- 89.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT255B vs Challenger MT425
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT425
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 243 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
ChallengerChallenger MT255B
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT425
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ MT425 higher · +154 ci (+172%)MT255B89.3 ci
MT425243 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT255B is in the 15th percentile; MT425 is in the 67th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MT425 higher · +1 (+33%)MT255B3
MT4254
Median Utility Tractor4
MT255B is in the 23rd percentile; MT425 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT425 higher · +3,759 lb (+155%)MT255B2,423 lb
MT4256,182 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
MT255B is in the 15th percentile; MT425 is in the 58th · 5,107 models
Width
▲ MT425 higher · +26.4 in (+52%)MT255B50.6 in
MT42577 in
Median Utility Tractor66 in
MT255B is in the 18th percentile; MT425 is in the 75th · 3,933 models
MT255B (A)MT425 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT255B | Challenger MT425 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | MT255B | MT425 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT255B | Challenger MT425 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Perkins | — |
| Model | E3CF | 3054 | — |
| Power Output | 28.4hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ MT255B+300 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ MT425+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 89.3ci | 243ci | ▲ MT425+154 ci · +172% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 3.9in | ▲ MT425+0.5 in · +15% |
| Stroke | 3.3in | 5in | ▲ MT425+1.7 in · +52% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT255B | Challenger MT425 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | 24-speed power shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT255B | Challenger MT425 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 112in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 50.6in | 77in | ▲ MT425+26.4 in · +52% |
| Height | 80.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 2,423lb | 6,182lb | ▲ MT425+3,759 lb · +155% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT255B | Challenger MT425 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT255B | Challenger MT425 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | 3 Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,609lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT255B | Challenger MT425 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT255B | Challenger MT425 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT255B | Challenger MT425 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT255B | Challenger MT425 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 15th percentile (89.3 ci)B · 67th percentile (243 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 15th percentile (2,423 lb)B · 58th percentile (6,182 lb)
Width
median 66 inA · 18th percentile (50.6 in)B · 75th percentile (77 in)
A · MT255BB · MT425Median Utility Tractor