Head to head · Utility

Challenger MT255B vs Challenger MT445

Challenger MT255B Tractor
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT255B

Utility

power
28.4 hp
displacement
89.3 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full MT255B specs
Challenger MT445 Tractor
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT445

Utility

power
Not recorded
displacement
258 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
24
Full MT445 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT255B
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT445

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 3,933–5,720

Engine Displacement

▲ MT445 higher · +169 ci (+189%)
MT255B89.3 ci
MT445258 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

MT255B is in the 15th percentile; MT445 is in the 73rd · 5,580 models

Cylinders

▲ MT445 higher · +1 (+33%)
MT255B3
MT4454
Median Utility Tractor4

MT255B is in the 23rd percentile; MT445 is in the 50th · 5,720 models

Operating Weight

▲ MT445 higher · +3,788 lb (+156%)
MT255B2,423 lb
MT4456,211 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb

MT255B is in the 15th percentile; MT445 is in the 59th · 5,107 models

Length

▲ MT445 higher · +51 in (+46%)
MT255B112 in
MT445163 in
Median Utility Tractor137 in

MT255B is in the 18th percentile; MT445 is in the 81st · 4,659 models

MT255B (A)MT445 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT255BChallenger MT445Difference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT255BMT445—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT255BChallenger MT445Difference
ManufacturerIsekiPerkins—
ModelE3CF3054B—
Power Output28.4hpNot recorded—
Rated RPM2,500RPM2,200RPM▲ MT255B+300 RPM · +14%
Cylinders34▲ MT445+1 · +33%
Displacement89.3ci258ci▲ MT445+169 ci · +189%
Bore3.4in4.1in▲ MT445+0.7 in · +21%
Stroke3.3in5in▲ MT445+1.7 in · +52%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT255BChallenger MT445Difference
TypeHydrostaticPower Shuttle—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT255BChallenger MT445Difference
Length112in163in▲ MT445+51 in · +46%
Width50.6in77in▲ MT445+26.4 in · +52%
Height80.7in103in▲ MT445+22.3 in · +28%
Operating Weight2,423lb6,211lb▲ MT445+3,788 lb · +156%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT255BChallenger MT445Difference
System TypeOpen CenterOpen CenterSame
Steering TypePowerNot recorded—

Tread Width

SpecChallenger MT255BChallenger MT445Difference
Front Tread WidthNot recorded12.4in—
Rear TreadNot recorded13.6in—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT255BChallenger MT445Difference
Hitch Type3 Point HitchCategory 2—
Hitch CategoryICategory 2—
Hitch PositionNot recordedRear—
Hitch Capacity1,609lbNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT255BChallenger MT445Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x2—
Drive Type4WD2WD—
Steering TypePowerNot recorded—
Brake TypeNot recordedWet Disc—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT255BChallenger MT445Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectric Starter—

Capacities

SpecChallenger MT255BChallenger MT445Difference
Coolant1.5galNot recorded—

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT255BChallenger MT445Difference
TypeOpenOpen (ROPS)—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 15th percentile (89.3 ci)B · 73rd percentile (258 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 15th percentile (2,423 lb)B · 59th percentile (6,211 lb)

Length

median 137 in
A · 18th percentile (112 in)B · 81st percentile (163 in)

Width

median 66 in
A · 18th percentile (50.6 in)B · 75th percentile (77 in)
A · MT255BB · MT445Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT255BFull spec pageChallenger MT445