ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT255B
Utility
- power
- 28.4 hp
- displacement
- 89.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT255B vs Challenger MT465
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT465
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 243 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
ChallengerChallenger MT255B
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT465
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ MT465 higher · +154 ci (+172%)MT255B89.3 ci
MT465243 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT255B is in the 15th percentile; MT465 is in the 67th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MT465 higher · +1 (+33%)MT255B3
MT4654
Median Utility Tractor4
MT255B is in the 23rd percentile; MT465 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT465 higher · +4,491 lb (+185%)MT255B2,423 lb
MT4656,914 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
MT255B is in the 15th percentile; MT465 is in the 66th · 5,107 models
Length
▲ MT465 higher · +52 in (+46%)MT255B112 in
MT465164 in
Median Utility Tractor137 in
MT255B is in the 18th percentile; MT465 is in the 82nd · 4,659 models
MT255B (A)MT465 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT255B | Challenger MT465 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | MT255B | MT465 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT255B | Challenger MT465 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Perkins | — |
| Model | E3CF | 3054 DITA | — |
| Power Output | 28.4hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ MT255B+300 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ MT465+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 89.3ci | 243ci | ▲ MT465+154 ci · +172% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 3.9in | ▲ MT465+0.5 in · +15% |
| Stroke | 3.3in | 5in | ▲ MT465+1.7 in · +52% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT255B | Challenger MT465 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Power Shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT255B | Challenger MT465 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 112in | 164in | ▲ MT465+52 in · +46% |
| Width | 50.6in | 77in | ▲ MT465+26.4 in · +52% |
| Height | 80.7in | 103in | ▲ MT465+22.3 in · +28% |
| Operating Weight | 2,423lb | 6,914lb | ▲ MT465+4,491 lb · +185% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT255B | Challenger MT465 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT255B | Challenger MT465 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | 3 Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,609lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT255B | Challenger MT465 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT255B | Challenger MT465 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT255B | Challenger MT465 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT255B | Challenger MT465 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 15th percentile (89.3 ci)B · 67th percentile (243 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 15th percentile (2,423 lb)B · 66th percentile (6,914 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 18th percentile (112 in)B · 82nd percentile (164 in)
Width
median 66 inA · 18th percentile (50.6 in)B · 75th percentile (77 in)
A · MT255BB · MT465Median Utility Tractor