Head to head · Utility

Challenger MT285 vs Challenger MT295

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT285

Utility

power
40.1 hp
displacement
91.4 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
16
Full MT285 specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT295

Utility

power
44.2 hp
displacement
134 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
16
Full MT295 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT285
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT295

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 1,083–5,720

Engine Power

▲ MT295 higher · +4.1 hp (+10%)
MT28540.1 hp
MT29544.2 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

MT285 is in the 34th percentile; MT295 is in the 38th · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT295 higher · +42.6 ci (+47%)
MT28591.4 ci
MT295134 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

MT285 is in the 18th percentile; MT295 is in the 32nd · 5,580 models

Cylinders

▲ MT295 higher · +1 (+33%)
MT2853
MT2954
Median Utility Tractor4

MT285 is in the 23rd percentile; MT295 is in the 50th · 5,720 models

Forward Gears

= Effectively tied
MT28516
MT29516
Median Utility Tractor12

MT285 is in the 73rd percentile; MT295 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models

MT285 (A)MT295 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT285Challenger MT295Difference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT285MT295—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT285Challenger MT295Difference
ManufacturerIsekiIsekiSame
Power Output40.1hp44.2hp▲ MT295+4.1 hp · +10%
Rated RPM2,600RPM2,500RPM▲ MT285+100 RPM · +4%
Cylinders34▲ MT295+1 · +33%
Displacement91.4ci134ci▲ MT295+42.6 ci · +47%
Bore3.4in3.4inSame
Stroke3.3in3.6in▲ MT295+0.3 in · +9%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT285Challenger MT295Difference
TypeSynchronized Power ShuttlePower shuttle—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT285Challenger MT295Difference
Length122in141in▲ MT295+19 in · +16%
Width60.6in71.5in▲ MT295+10.9 in · +18%
Height93.2in95.9in▲ MT295+2.7 in · +3%
Operating Weight3,174lb4,277lb▲ MT295+1,103 lb · +35%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT285Challenger MT295Difference
System TypeOpen centerOpen centerSame
Steering TypePowerPowerSame

Tires

SpecChallenger MT285Challenger MT295Difference
Front Tire SizeNot recorded9.5-16—
Rear Tire SizeNot recorded13.6-28—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT285Challenger MT295Difference
Hitch Type3 PointThree-Point Hitch—
Hitch CategoryIISame
Hitch Capacity2,100lb2,600lb▲ MT295+500 lb · +24%

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT285Challenger MT295Difference
Chassis Type4x44x4 MFWD 4WD—
Drive Type4WD4WDSame
Steering TypePowerPowerSame

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT285Challenger MT295Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT285Challenger MT295Difference
TypeROPSROPSSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 34th percentile (40.1 hp)B · 38th percentile (44.2 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 18th percentile (91.4 ci)B · 32nd percentile (134 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)

Forward Gears

median 12
A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 25th percentile (3,174 lb)B · 41st percentile (4,277 lb)
A · MT285B · MT295Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT285Full spec pageChallenger MT295