Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT285B
Utility
- power
- 47.5 hp
- displacement
- 134 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT285B vs Challenger MT295B
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT295B
Utility
- power
- 52.1 hp
- displacement
- 180 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 8
ChallengerChallenger MT285B
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT295B
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT295B higher · +4.6 hp (+10%)MT285B47.5 hp
MT295B52.1 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT285B is in the 43rd percentile; MT295B is in the 48th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT295B higher · +46 ci (+34%)MT285B134 ci
MT295B180 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT285B is in the 32nd percentile; MT295B is in the 49th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT285B4
MT295B4
Median Utility Tractor4
MT285B is in the 50th percentile; MT295B is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedMT285B8
MT295B8
Median Utility Tractor12
MT285B is in the 23rd percentile; MT295B is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
MT285B (A)MT295B (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT285B | Challenger MT295B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | MT285B | MT295B | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT285B | Challenger MT295B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Iseki | Same |
| Model | E4CG | E4DD | — |
| Power Output | 47.5hp | 52.1hp | ▲ MT295B+4.6 hp · +10% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,600RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 134ci | 180ci | ▲ MT295B+46 ci · +34% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 3.8in | ▲ MT295B+0.4 in · +12% |
| Stroke | 3.6in | 3.9in | ▲ MT295B+0.3 in · +8% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT285B | Challenger MT295B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic / Synchroshuttle | SynchroShuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT285B | Challenger MT295B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 133in | 133in | Same |
| Width | 65.4in | 65.4in | Same |
| Height | 89.1in | 89.1in | Same |
| Operating Weight | 3,660lb | 3,726lb | ▲ MT295B+66 lb · +2% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT285B | Challenger MT295B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT285B | Challenger MT295B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | 3 Point | Three Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 3,086lb | 3,086lb | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT285B | Challenger MT295B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT285B | Challenger MT295B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT285B | Challenger MT295B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 2gal | 2gal | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT285B | Challenger MT295B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open Station | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 43rd percentile (47.5 hp)B · 48th percentile (52.1 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 32nd percentile (134 ci)B · 49th percentile (180 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 31st percentile (3,660 lb)B · 32nd percentile (3,726 lb)
A · MT285BB · MT295BMedian Utility Tractor