Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT285B
Utility
- power
- 47.5 hp
- displacement
- 134 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT285B vs John Deere 4052M
John DeereModel B
John Deere 4052M
Utility
- power
- 51.5 hp
- displacement
- 128 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
ChallengerChallenger MT285B
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 4052M
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 4052M higher · +4 hp (+8%)MT285B47.5 hp
4052M51.5 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT285B is in the 43rd percentile; 4052M is in the 47th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT285B higher · +6 ci (+5%)MT285B134 ci
4052M128 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT285B is in the 32nd percentile; 4052M is in the 30th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT285B4
4052M4
Median Utility Tractor4
MT285B is in the 50th percentile; 4052M is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 4052M higher · +4 (+50%)MT285B8
4052M12
Median Utility Tractor12
MT285B is in the 23rd percentile; 4052M is in the 50th · 4,941 models
MT285B (A)4052M (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT285B | John Deere 4052M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | John Deere | — |
| Model | MT285B | 4052M | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT285B | John Deere 4052M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Yanmar | — |
| Model | E4CG | 4TNV86 | — |
| Power Output | 47.5hp | 51.5hp | ▲ 4052M+4 hp · +8% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,600RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 134ci | 128ci | ▲ MT285B+6 ci · +5% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 3.4in | Same |
| Stroke | 3.6in | 3.5in | ▲ MT285B+0.1 in · +3% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT285B | John Deere 4052M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic / Synchroshuttle | Power shuttle / Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT285B | John Deere 4052M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 133in | 130in | ▲ MT285B+3 in · +2% |
| Width | 65.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 89.1in | 100in | ▲ 4052M+10.9 in · +12% |
| Operating Weight | 3,660lb | 3,770lb | ▲ 4052M+110 lb · +3% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT285B | John Deere 4052M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger MT285B | John Deere 4052M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Independent | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT285B | John Deere 4052M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | 3 Point | Three-Point Hitch Category I | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 3,086lb | 3,130lb | ▲ 4052M+44 lb · +1% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT285B | John Deere 4052M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | MFWD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT285B | John Deere 4052M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT285B | John Deere 4052M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 2gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT285B | John Deere 4052M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open Station | Two-post folding ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 43rd percentile (47.5 hp)B · 47th percentile (51.5 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 32nd percentile (134 ci)B · 30th percentile (128 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 31st percentile (3,660 lb)B · 33rd percentile (3,770 lb)
A · MT285BB · 4052MMedian Utility Tractor