Head to head · Utility

Challenger MT295B vs Challenger MT297

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT295B

Utility

power
52.1 hp
displacement
180 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
8
Full MT295B specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT297

Utility

power
55.3 hp
displacement
173 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
12
Full MT297 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT295B
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT297

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 1,083–5,720

Engine Power

▲ MT297 higher · +3.2 hp (+6%)
MT295B52.1 hp
MT29755.3 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

MT295B is in the 48th percentile; MT297 is in the 50th · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT295B higher · +7 ci (+4%)
MT295B180 ci
MT297173 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

MT295B is in the 49th percentile; MT297 is in the 46th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT295B4
MT2974
Median Utility Tractor4

MT295B is in the 50th percentile; MT297 is in the 50th · 5,720 models

Forward Gears

▲ MT297 higher · +4 (+50%)
MT295B8
MT29712
Median Utility Tractor12

MT295B is in the 23rd percentile; MT297 is in the 50th · 4,941 models

MT295B (A)MT297 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT295BChallenger MT297Difference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT295BMT297—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT295BChallenger MT297Difference
ManufacturerIsekiIsekiSame
ModelE4DDNot recorded—
Power Output52.1hp55.3hp▲ MT297+3.2 hp · +6%
Rated RPM2,600RPM2,500RPM▲ MT295B+100 RPM · +4%
Cylinders44Same
Displacement180ci173ci▲ MT295B+7 ci · +4%
Bore3.8inNot recorded—
Stroke3.9inNot recorded—

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT295BChallenger MT297Difference
TypeSynchroShuttleMechanical shuttle—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT295BChallenger MT297Difference
Length133in137in▲ MT297+4 in · +3%
Width65.4in71.5in▲ MT297+6.1 in · +9%
Height89.1in95.5in▲ MT297+6.4 in · +7%
Operating Weight3,726lb3,878lb▲ MT297+152 lb · +4%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT295BChallenger MT297Difference
System TypeOpen CenterOpen CenterSame
Steering TypePowerPowerSame

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT295BChallenger MT297Difference
Hitch TypeThree Point Hitch3 Point Hitch—
Hitch CategoryIISame
Hitch PositionRearRearSame
Hitch Capacity3,086lb2,600lb▲ MT295B+486 lb · +19%

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT295BChallenger MT297Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x4 MFWD 4WDSame
Drive Type4WD4WDSame
Steering TypePowerPowerSame

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT295BChallenger MT297Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Capacities

SpecChallenger MT295BChallenger MT297Difference
Coolant2galNot recorded—

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT295BChallenger MT297Difference
TypeNot recordedROPS—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 48th percentile (52.1 hp)B · 50th percentile (55.3 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 49th percentile (180 ci)B · 46th percentile (173 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)

Forward Gears

median 12
A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 50th percentile (12)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 32nd percentile (3,726 lb)B · 35th percentile (3,878 lb)
A · MT295BB · MT297Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT295BFull spec pageChallenger MT297