Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT295B
Utility
- power
- 52.1 hp
- displacement
- 180 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT295B vs Kubota MX5200HSTRC
KubotaModel B
Kubota MX5200HSTRC
Utility
- power
- 52.1 hp
- displacement
- 149 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT295B
vs
KubotaKubota MX5200HSTRC
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedMT295B52.1 hp
MX5200HSTRC52.1 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT295B is in the 48th percentile; MX5200HSTRC is in the 48th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT295B higher · +31 ci (+21%)MT295B180 ci
MX5200HSTRC149 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT295B is in the 49th percentile; MX5200HSTRC is in the 38th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT295B4
MX5200HSTRC4
Median Utility Tractor4
MT295B is in the 50th percentile; MX5200HSTRC is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ MX5200HSTRC higher · +9 lb (<1%)MT295B3,726 lb
MX5200HSTRC3,735 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
MT295B is in the 32nd percentile; MX5200HSTRC is in the 32nd · 5,107 models
MT295B (A)MX5200HSTRC (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT295B | Kubota MX5200HSTRC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Kubota | — |
| Model | MT295B | MX5200HSTRC | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT295B | Kubota MX5200HSTRC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Kubota | — |
| Model | E4DD | V2403CR-T | — |
| Power Output | 52.1hp | 52.1hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 180ci | 149ci | ▲ MT295B+31 ci · +21% |
| Bore | 3.8in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 3.9in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT295B | Kubota MX5200HSTRC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | SynchroShuttle | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT295B | Kubota MX5200HSTRC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 133in | 125in | ▲ MT295B+8 in · +6% |
| Width | 65.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 89.1in | 96in | ▲ MX5200HSTRC+6.9 in · +8% |
| Operating Weight | 3,726lb | 3,735lb | ▲ MX5200HSTRC+9 lb · <1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT295B | Kubota MX5200HSTRC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger MT295B | Kubota MX5200HSTRC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT295B | Kubota MX5200HSTRC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 3,086lb | 2,315lb | ▲ MT295B+771 lb · +33% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT295B | Kubota MX5200HSTRC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT295B | Kubota MX5200HSTRC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT295B | Kubota MX5200HSTRC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 2gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 48th percentile (52.1 hp)B · 48th percentile (52.1 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 49th percentile (180 ci)B · 38th percentile (149 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 32nd percentile (3,726 lb)B · 32nd percentile (3,735 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 44th percentile (133 in)B · 34th percentile (125 in)
A · MT295BB · MX5200HSTRCMedian Utility Tractor