Head to head · Utility

Challenger MT295B vs Yanmar YT359

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT295B

Utility

power
52.1 hp
displacement
180 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
8
Full MT295B specs
Image not recorded
YanmarModel B

Yanmar YT359

Utility

power
59.7 hp
displacement
203 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full YT359 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT295B
vs
YanmarYanmar YT359

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 1,083–5,720

Engine Power

▲ YT359 higher · +7.6 hp (+15%)
MT295B52.1 hp
YT35959.7 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

MT295B is in the 48th percentile; YT359 is in the 53rd · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ YT359 higher · +23 ci (+13%)
MT295B180 ci
YT359203 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

MT295B is in the 49th percentile; YT359 is in the 55th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT295B4
YT3594
Median Utility Tractor4

MT295B is in the 50th percentile; YT359 is in the 50th · 5,720 models

Operating Weight

▲ YT359 higher · +313 lb (+8%)
MT295B3,726 lb
YT3594,039 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb

MT295B is in the 32nd percentile; YT359 is in the 37th · 5,107 models

MT295B (A)YT359 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT295BYanmar YT359Difference
ManufacturerChallengerYanmar—
ModelMT295BYT359—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT295BYanmar YT359Difference
ManufacturerIsekiYanmar—
ModelE4DD4TNV98C—
Power Output52.1hp59.7hp▲ YT359+7.6 hp · +15%
Rated RPM2,600RPM2,500RPM▲ MT295B+100 RPM · +4%
Cylinders44Same
Displacement180ci203ci▲ YT359+23 ci · +13%
Bore3.8in3.9in▲ YT359+0.1 in · +3%
Stroke3.9in4.4in▲ YT359+0.5 in · +13%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT295BYanmar YT359Difference
TypeSynchroShuttlehydro-mechanical CVT—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT295BYanmar YT359Difference
Length133in132in▲ MT295B+1 in · <1%
Width65.4in70.9in▲ YT359+5.5 in · +8%
Height89.1in96in▲ YT359+6.9 in · +8%
Operating Weight3,726lb4,039lb▲ YT359+313 lb · +8%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT295BYanmar YT359Difference
System TypeOpen CenterNot recorded—
Steering TypePowerNot recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT295BYanmar YT359Difference
Hitch TypeThree Point Hitch3 Point Hitch—
Hitch CategoryICategory 1—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame
Hitch Capacity3,086lb2,756lb▲ MT295B+330 lb · +12%

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT295BYanmar YT359Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x4 MFWD 4WDSame
Drive Type4WD4WDSame
Steering TypePowerNot recorded—
Brake TypeNot recordedMechanical wet disc—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT295BYanmar YT359Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Capacities

SpecChallenger MT295BYanmar YT359Difference
Coolant2gal2galSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 48th percentile (52.1 hp)B · 53rd percentile (59.7 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 49th percentile (180 ci)B · 55th percentile (203 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 32nd percentile (3,726 lb)B · 37th percentile (4,039 lb)

Length

median 137 in
A · 44th percentile (133 in)B · 44th percentile (132 in)
A · MT295BB · YT359Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT295BFull spec pageYanmar YT359