Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT325B
Utility
- power
- 68 hp
- displacement
- 201 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT325B vs Fendt 206
Image not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT325B
vs
FendtFendt 206
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT325B higher · +3.6 hp (+6%)MT325B68 hp
20664.4 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT325B is in the 61st percentile; 206 is in the 58th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT325B higher · +3 ci (+2%)MT325B201 ci
206198 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT325B is in the 55th percentile; 206 is in the 52nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT325B3
2063
Median Utility Tractor4
MT325B is in the 23rd percentile; 206 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 206 higher · +9 (+75%)MT325B12
20621
Median Utility Tractor12
MT325B is in the 50th percentile; 206 is in the 88th · 4,941 models
MT325B (A)206 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT325B | Fendt 206 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Fendt | — |
| Model | MT325B | 206 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT325B | Fendt 206 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Deutz | — |
| Power Output | 68hp | 64.4hp | ▲ MT325B+3.6 hp · +6% |
| Rated RPM | 2,150RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ 206+150 RPM · +7% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 201ci | 198ci | ▲ MT325B+3 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4in | ▲ MT325B+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5in | 5.2in | ▲ 206+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT325B | Fendt 206 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchronized shuttle | Synchromesh / Shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT325B | Fendt 206 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 148in | 140in | ▲ MT325B+8 in · +6% |
| Width | 76in | 75.8in | ▲ MT325B+0.2 in · <1% |
| Height | 105in | 97.4in | ▲ MT325B+7.6 in · +8% |
| Operating Weight | 6,614lb | 6,460lb | ▲ MT325B+154 lb · +2% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT325B | Fendt 206 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger MT325B | Fendt 206 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 335/80R18 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 16.9R28 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT325B | Fendt 206 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | I/II | Category 3 | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT325B | Fendt 206 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT325B | Fendt 206 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT325B | Fendt 206 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open (with ROPS) | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 61st percentile (68 hp)B · 58th percentile (64.4 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 55th percentile (201 ci)B · 52nd percentile (198 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 88th percentile (21)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 63rd percentile (6,614 lb)B · 61st percentile (6,460 lb)
A · MT325BB · 206Median Utility Tractor