Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT325B
Utility
- power
- 68 hp
- displacement
- 201 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT325B vs Massey Ferguson 2430
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 2430
Utility
- power
- 65.7 hp
- displacement
- 201 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 30
ChallengerChallenger MT325B
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 2430
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT325B higher · +2.3 hp (+4%)MT325B68 hp
243065.7 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT325B is in the 61st percentile; 2430 is in the 60th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedMT325B201 ci
2430201 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT325B is in the 55th percentile; 2430 is in the 54th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 2430 higher · +1 (+33%)MT325B3
24304
Median Utility Tractor4
MT325B is in the 23rd percentile; 2430 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 2430 higher · +18 (+150%)MT325B12
243030
Median Utility Tractor12
MT325B is in the 50th percentile; 2430 is in the 96th · 4,941 models
MT325B (A)2430 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT325B | Massey Ferguson 2430 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | MT325B | 2430 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT325B | Massey Ferguson 2430 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Perkins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 800 | — |
| Power Output | 68hp | 65.7hp | ▲ MT325B+2.3 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,150RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ 2430+350 RPM · +16% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ 2430+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 201ci | 201ci | Same |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.7in | ▲ MT325B+0.4 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 5in | 4.7in | ▲ MT325B+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT325B | Massey Ferguson 2430 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchronized shuttle | Power shuttle, two-speed power shift, Speedshift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT325B | Massey Ferguson 2430 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 148in | 158in | ▲ 2430+10 in · +7% |
| Width | 76in | 74in | ▲ MT325B+2 in · +3% |
| Height | 105in | 94.5in | ▲ MT325B+10.5 in · +11% |
| Operating Weight | 6,614lb | 6,724lb | ▲ 2430+110 lb · +2% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT325B | Massey Ferguson 2430 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT325B | Massey Ferguson 2430 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | I/II | II | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT325B | Massey Ferguson 2430 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT325B | Massey Ferguson 2430 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT325B | Massey Ferguson 2430 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open (with ROPS) | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 61st percentile (68 hp)B · 60th percentile (65.7 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 55th percentile (201 ci)B · 54th percentile (201 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 96th percentile (30)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 63rd percentile (6,614 lb)B · 64th percentile (6,724 lb)
A · MT325BB · 2430Median Utility Tractor