Head to head · Sub-Compact

Challenger MT335 vs Rhino 324

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT335

Sub-Compact

power
33 hp
displacement
Not recorded
Cylinders
Not recorded
Forward gears
16
Full MT335 specs
Image not recorded
RhinoModel B

Rhino 324

Agricultural

power
32 hp
displacement
Not recorded
Cylinders
Not recorded
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full 324 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT335
vs
RhinoRhino 324

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact

n = 816–816

Engine Power

▲ MT335 higher · +1 hp (+3%)
MT33533 hp
32432 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp

MT335 is in the 61st percentile; 324 is in the 60th · 816 models

MT335 (A)324 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT335Rhino 324Difference
ManufacturerChallengerRhino—
ModelMT335324—
CategorySub-CompactAgricultural—

Engine

SpecChallenger MT335Rhino 324Difference
ManufacturerMitsubishiNot recorded—
Power Output33hp32hp▲ MT335+1 hp · +3%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT335Rhino 324Difference
TypeManualNot recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT335Rhino 324Difference
Hitch CategoryNot recordedIII—

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT335Rhino 324Difference
Chassis TypeNot recorded4x4 MFWD 4WD—
Drive TypeNot recorded4WD—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT335Rhino 324Difference
Starter TypeElectricNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 26.9 hp
A · 61st percentile (33 hp)B · 60th percentile (32 hp)
A · MT335B · 324Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT335Full spec pageRhino 324