Head to head · Sub-Compact

Challenger MT335 vs Rhino 344

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT335

Sub-Compact

power
33 hp
displacement
Not recorded
Cylinders
Not recorded
Forward gears
16
Full MT335 specs
Image not recorded
RhinoModel B

Rhino 344

Agricultural

power
34 hp
displacement
Not recorded
Cylinders
Not recorded
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full 344 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT335
vs
RhinoRhino 344

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact

n = 816–816

Engine Power

▲ 344 higher · +1 hp (+3%)
MT33533 hp
34434 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp

MT335 is in the 61st percentile; 344 is in the 62nd · 816 models

MT335 (A)344 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT335Rhino 344Difference
ManufacturerChallengerRhino—
ModelMT335344—
CategorySub-CompactAgricultural—

Engine

SpecChallenger MT335Rhino 344Difference
ManufacturerMitsubishiNot recorded—
Power Output33hp34hp▲ 344+1 hp · +3%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT335Rhino 344Difference
TypeManualNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT335Rhino 344Difference
Chassis TypeNot recorded4x4 MFWD 4WD—
Drive TypeNot recorded4WD—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT335Rhino 344Difference
Starter TypeElectricNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 26.9 hp
A · 61st percentile (33 hp)B · 62nd percentile (34 hp)
A · MT335B · 344Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT335Full spec pageRhino 344