ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT335B
Utility
- power
- 78 hp
- displacement
- 201 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT335B vs LS PS80
Image not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT335B
vs
LSLS PS80
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ PS80 higher · +1 hp (+1%)MT335B78 hp
PS8079 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT335B is in the 70th percentile; PS80 is in the 70th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT335B higher · +6 ci (+3%)MT335B201 ci
PS80195 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT335B is in the 55th percentile; PS80 is in the 52nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ PS80 higher · +1 (+33%)MT335B3
PS804
Median Utility Tractor4
MT335B is in the 23rd percentile; PS80 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedMT335B12
PS8012
Median Utility Tractor12
MT335B is in the 50th percentile; PS80 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
MT335B (A)PS80 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT335B | LS PS80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | LS | — |
| Model | MT335B | PS80 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT335B | LS PS80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | FPT | — |
| Model | Not recorded | F5C | — |
| Power Output | 78hp | 79hp | ▲ PS80+1 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,150RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ PS80+150 RPM · +7% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ PS80+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 201ci | 195ci | ▲ MT335B+6 ci · +3% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.9in | ▲ MT335B+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5in | 4.1in | ▲ MT335B+0.9 in · +22% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT335B | LS PS80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 12-speed Synchronized Shuttle | Synchronized shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT335B | LS PS80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 148in | 157in | ▲ PS80+9 in · +6% |
| Width | 76in | 77.8in | ▲ PS80+1.8 in · +2% |
| Height | Not recorded | 105in | — |
| Operating Weight | 6,614lb | 6,363lb | ▲ MT335B+251 lb · +4% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT335B | LS PS80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT335B | LS PS80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | 3 Point Hitch | Three-point hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | I/II | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT335B | LS PS80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | MFWD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT335B | LS PS80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT335B | LS PS80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Either Cab or Open (ROPS) | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 70th percentile (78 hp)B · 70th percentile (79 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 55th percentile (201 ci)B · 52nd percentile (195 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 63rd percentile (6,614 lb)B · 60th percentile (6,363 lb)
A · MT335BB · PS80Median Utility Tractor