ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT335B
Utility
- power
- 78 hp
- displacement
- 201 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT335B vs Massey Ferguson 2435
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 2435
Utility
- power
- 75.1 hp
- displacement
- 201 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 30
ChallengerChallenger MT335B
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 2435
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT335B higher · +2.9 hp (+4%)MT335B78 hp
243575.1 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT335B is in the 70th percentile; 2435 is in the 68th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedMT335B201 ci
2435201 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT335B is in the 55th percentile; 2435 is in the 54th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 2435 higher · +1 (+33%)MT335B3
24354
Median Utility Tractor4
MT335B is in the 23rd percentile; 2435 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 2435 higher · +18 (+150%)MT335B12
243530
Median Utility Tractor12
MT335B is in the 50th percentile; 2435 is in the 96th · 4,941 models
MT335B (A)2435 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT335B | Massey Ferguson 2435 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | MT335B | 2435 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT335B | Massey Ferguson 2435 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Perkins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 800 | — |
| Power Output | 78hp | 75.1hp | ▲ MT335B+2.9 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,150RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ 2435+350 RPM · +16% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ 2435+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 201ci | 201ci | Same |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.7in | ▲ MT335B+0.4 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 5in | 4.7in | ▲ MT335B+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT335B | Massey Ferguson 2435 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 12-speed Synchronized Shuttle | Two-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT335B | Massey Ferguson 2435 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 148in | 158in | ▲ 2435+10 in · +7% |
| Width | 76in | 74in | ▲ MT335B+2 in · +3% |
| Height | Not recorded | 94.5in | — |
| Operating Weight | 6,614lb | 6,724lb | ▲ 2435+110 lb · +2% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT335B | Massey Ferguson 2435 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT335B | Massey Ferguson 2435 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | 3 Point Hitch | Category II | — |
| Hitch Category | I/II | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT335B | Massey Ferguson 2435 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT335B | Massey Ferguson 2435 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT335B | Massey Ferguson 2435 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Either Cab or Open (ROPS) | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 70th percentile (78 hp)B · 68th percentile (75.1 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 55th percentile (201 ci)B · 54th percentile (201 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 96th percentile (30)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 63rd percentile (6,614 lb)B · 64th percentile (6,724 lb)
A · MT335BB · 2435Median Utility Tractor