ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT455
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 243 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT455 vs Kubota M95S
KubotaModel B
Kubota M95S
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 230 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 32
ChallengerChallenger MT455
vs
KubotaKubota M95S
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ MT455 higher · +13 ci (+6%)MT455243 ci
M95S230 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT455 is in the 67th percentile; M95S is in the 62nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT4554
M95S4
Median Utility Tractor4
MT455 is in the 50th percentile; M95S is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ M95S higher · +8 (+33%)MT45524
M95S32
Median Utility Tractor12
MT455 is in the 92nd percentile; M95S is in the 97th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ M95S higher · +50 lb (<1%)MT4556,211 lb
M95S6,261 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
MT455 is in the 59th percentile; M95S is in the 59th · 5,107 models
MT455 (A)M95S (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT455 | Kubota M95S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Kubota | — |
| Model | MT455 | M95S | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT455 | Kubota M95S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | Kubota | — |
| Model | 3054 DITA | V3800-DI-T | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ M95S+400 RPM · +18% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 243ci | 230ci | ▲ MT455+13 ci · +6% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 3.9in | Same |
| Stroke | 5in | 4.7in | ▲ MT455+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT455 | Kubota M95S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Power Shuttle | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT455 | Kubota M95S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 163in | 162in | ▲ MT455+1 in · <1% |
| Width | 81in | 79in | ▲ MT455+2 in · +3% |
| Height | 104in | 106in | ▲ M95S+2 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 6,211lb | 6,261lb | ▲ M95S+50 lb · <1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT455 | Kubota M95S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT455 | Kubota M95S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | 3 | — |
| Hitch Category | II | II | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT455 | Kubota M95S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT455 | Kubota M95S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT455 | Kubota M95S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 67th percentile (243 ci)B · 62nd percentile (230 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 92nd percentile (24)B · 97th percentile (32)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 59th percentile (6,211 lb)B · 59th percentile (6,261 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 81st percentile (163 in)B · 79th percentile (162 in)
A · MT455B · M95SMedian Utility Tractor