Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT465
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 243 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT465 vs Massey Ferguson 210
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 210
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 77.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 12
ChallengerChallenger MT465
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 210
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ MT465 higher · +166 ci (+215%)MT465243 ci
21077.1 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT465 is in the 67th percentile; 210 is in the 11th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MT465 higher · +2 (+100%)MT4654
2102
Median Utility Tractor4
MT465 is in the 50th percentile; 210 is in the 3rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT465 higher · +12 (+100%)MT46524
21012
Median Utility Tractor12
MT465 is in the 92nd percentile; 210 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT465 higher · +4,589 lb (+197%)MT4656,914 lb
2102,325 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
MT465 is in the 66th percentile; 210 is in the 15th · 5,107 models
MT465 (A)210 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT465 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | MT465 | 210 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT465 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | Toyosha | — |
| Model | 3054 DITA | P126 | — |
| Power Output | Not recorded | 25hp | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ 210+300 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 2 | ▲ MT465+2 · +100% |
| Displacement | 243ci | 77.1ci | ▲ MT465+166 ci · +215% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 3.6in | ▲ MT465+0.3 in · +8% |
| Stroke | 5in | 3.7in | ▲ MT465+1.3 in · +35% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT465 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Power Shuttle | gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT465 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 164in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 77in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 103in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 6,914lb | 2,325lb | ▲ MT465+4,589 lb · +197% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT465 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger MT465 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | 540 (1.375) | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT465 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | II | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT465 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT465 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT465 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 1.3gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 67th percentile (243 ci)B · 11th percentile (77.1 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 3rd percentile (2)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 92nd percentile (24)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 66th percentile (6,914 lb)B · 15th percentile (2,325 lb)
A · MT465B · 210Median Utility Tractor