ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT475D
Row Crop
- power
- 123 hp
- displacement
- 299 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Row Crop
Challenger MT475D vs Challenger MT565
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT565
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 402 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
ChallengerChallenger MT475D
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT565
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Displacement
▲ MT565 higher · +103 ci (+34%)MT475D299 ci
MT565402 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
MT475D is in the 31st percentile; MT565 is in the 52nd · 1,409 models
Cylinders
▲ MT565 higher · +2 (+50%)MT475D4
MT5656
Median Row Crop Tractor6
MT475D is in the 17th percentile; MT565 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT475D higher · +210 lb (+1%)MT475D15,765 lb
MT56515,555 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
MT475D is in the 69th percentile; MT565 is in the 69th · 1,350 models
MT475D (A)MT565 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT475D | Challenger MT565 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | MT475D | MT565 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT475D | Challenger MT565 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO Power | SISU | — |
| Model | 49AWI | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 123hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ MT565+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 299ci | 402ci | ▲ MT565+103 ci · +34% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.3in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 4.7in | ▲ MT475D+0.6 in · +13% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT475D | Challenger MT565 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously variable transmission (CVT) with two mechanical ranges | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT475D | Challenger MT565 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 198in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 98in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 120in | — |
| Wheelbase | 105in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 15,765lb | 15,555lb | ▲ MT475D+210 lb · +1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT475D | Challenger MT565 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Direct engine drive | Closed center pressure flow compensated (PFC) | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger MT475D | Challenger MT565 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 480/70R28 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 580/70R38 | Not recorded | — |
Tread Width
| Spec | Challenger MT475D | Challenger MT565 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tread Width | 52.8in | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tread | 52.8in | Not recorded | — |
| Front Tread Adjustment | 52.8" to 87.8" | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tread Adjustment | 52.8" to 87.8" | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT475D | Challenger MT565 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category II | III | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 2 | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT475D | Challenger MT565 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Multiple wet disc, hydraulically operated | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT475D | Challenger MT565 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 31st percentile (299 ci)B · 52nd percentile (402 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 17th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 69th percentile (15,765 lb)B · 69th percentile (15,555 lb)
A · MT475DB · MT565Median Row Crop Tractor