Head to head · Agricultural

Challenger MT495E vs Volvo 2654

Challenger MT495E Tractor
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT495E

Agricultural

power
138 hp
displacement
299 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
24
Full MT495E specs
Volvo 2654 Tractor
VolvoModel B

Volvo 2654

Utility

power
140 hp
displacement
334 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
14
Full 2654 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT495E
vs
VolvoVolvo 2654

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural

n = 497–1,130

Engine Power

▲ 2654 higher · +2 hp (+1%)
MT495E138 hp
2654140 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp

MT495E is in the 65th percentile; 2654 is in the 66th · 1,028 models

Engine Displacement

▲ 2654 higher · +35 ci (+12%)
MT495E299 ci
2654334 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci

MT495E is in the 46th percentile; 2654 is in the 50th · 1,083 models

Cylinders

▲ 2654 higher · +2 (+50%)
MT495E4
26546
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5

MT495E is in the 31st percentile; 2654 is in the 74th · 1,130 models

Forward Gears

▲ MT495E higher · +10 (+71%)
MT495E24
265414
Median Agricultural Tractor16

MT495E is in the 81st percentile; 2654 is in the 42nd · 972 models

MT495E (A)2654 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT495EVolvo 2654Difference
ManufacturerChallengerVolvo—
ModelMT495E2654—
CategoryAgriculturalUtility—

Engine

SpecChallenger MT495EVolvo 2654Difference
ManufacturerAGCO PowerVolvo—
ModelNot recordedTD60—
Power Output138hp140hp▲ 2654+2 hp · +1%
Rated RPM2,100RPM2,300RPM▲ 2654+200 RPM · +10%
Cylinders46▲ 2654+2 · +50%
Displacement299ci334ci▲ 2654+35 ci · +12%
Bore4.3in3.9in▲ MT495E+0.4 in · +10%
Stroke5.3in4.7in▲ MT495E+0.6 in · +13%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT495EVolvo 2654Difference
TypeTechStar CVTTwo-speed power shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT495EVolvo 2654Difference
LengthNot recorded183in—
Width72in91.7in▲ 2654+19.7 in · +27%
HeightNot recorded120in—
Wheelbase105inNot recorded—
Operating Weight16,810lb16,535lb▲ MT495E+275 lb · +2%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT495EVolvo 2654Difference
System TypeOpen CenterNot recorded—
Steering TypeNot recordedPower—

Tires

SpecChallenger MT495EVolvo 2654Difference
Front Tire SizeNot recorded14.9x24—
Rear Tire SizeNot recorded20.8x38—

Tread Width

SpecChallenger MT495EVolvo 2654Difference
Front Tread Width60.2inNot recorded—
Rear Tread66.3inNot recorded—
Front Tread Adjustment60.2 to 89.8 inchesNot recorded—
Rear Tread Adjustment66.3 to 96.7 inchesNot recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT495EVolvo 2654Difference
Hitch TypeNot recordedThree-Point Hitch—
Hitch CategoryIII/IIIII/IISame
Hitch PositionRearRearSame

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT495EVolvo 2654Difference
Chassis TypeNot recorded4x4 MFWD 4WD—
Drive TypeNot recorded4WD—
Steering TypeNot recordedPower—
Brake TypeHydraulic Wet Disc, operated by two foot pedals that can be locked togetherNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT495EVolvo 2654Difference
Starter TypeElectronicElectric—

Emissions

SpecChallenger MT495EVolvo 2654Difference
Control SystemSCR exhaust treatmentNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 110 hp
A · 65th percentile (138 hp)B · 66th percentile (140 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 336 ci
A · 46th percentile (299 ci)B · 50th percentile (334 ci)

Cylinders

median 5.5
A · 31st percentile (4)B · 74th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 81st percentile (24)B · 42nd percentile (14)

Operating Weight

median 10,914 lb
A · 76th percentile (16,810 lb)B · 75th percentile (16,535 lb)
A · MT495EB · 2654Median Agricultural Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT495EFull spec pageVolvo 2654