Head to head · Agricultural

Challenger MT495E vs Massey Ferguson 6616

Challenger MT495E Tractor
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT495E

Agricultural

power
138 hp
displacement
299 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
24
Full MT495E specs
Massey Ferguson 6616 Tractor
Massey FergusonModel B

Massey Ferguson 6616

Agricultural

power
141 hp
displacement
299 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full 6616 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT495E
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 6616

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural

n = 971–1,130

Engine Power

▲ 6616 higher · +3 hp (+2%)
MT495E138 hp
6616141 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp

MT495E is in the 65th percentile; 6616 is in the 66th · 1,028 models

Engine Displacement

= Effectively tied
MT495E299 ci
6616299 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci

MT495E is in the 46th percentile; 6616 is in the 46th · 1,083 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT495E4
66164
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5

MT495E is in the 31st percentile; 6616 is in the 31st · 1,130 models

Operating Weight

▲ MT495E higher · +880 lb (+6%)
MT495E16,810 lb
661615,930 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb

MT495E is in the 76th percentile; 6616 is in the 74th · 971 models

MT495E (A)6616 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT495EMassey Ferguson 6616Difference
ManufacturerChallengerMassey Ferguson—
ModelMT495E6616—
CategoryAgriculturalAgriculturalSame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT495EMassey Ferguson 6616Difference
ManufacturerAGCO PowerAGCO PowerSame
Power Output138hp141hp▲ 6616+3 hp · +2%
Rated RPM2,100RPM2,200RPM▲ 6616+100 RPM · +5%
Cylinders44Same
Displacement299ci299ciSame
Bore4.3in4.3inSame
Stroke5.3in5.3inSame

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT495EMassey Ferguson 6616Difference
TypeTechStar CVTCVT (Dyna-VT)—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT495EMassey Ferguson 6616Difference
LengthNot recorded185in—
Width72inNot recorded—
HeightNot recorded116in—
Wheelbase105inNot recorded—
Operating Weight16,810lb15,930lb▲ MT495E+880 lb · +6%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT495EMassey Ferguson 6616Difference
System TypeOpen CenterDirect engine drive—
Steering TypeNot recordedHydraulic power—

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecChallenger MT495EMassey Ferguson 6616Difference
TypeNot recorded540/1000—

Tires

SpecChallenger MT495EMassey Ferguson 6616Difference
Front Tire SizeNot recorded480/70R28—
Rear Tire SizeNot recorded580/70R38—

Tread Width

SpecChallenger MT495EMassey Ferguson 6616Difference
Front Tread Width60.2inNot recorded—
Rear Tread66.3inNot recorded—
Front Tread Adjustment60.2 to 89.8 inchesNot recorded—
Rear Tread Adjustment66.3 to 96.7 inchesNot recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT495EMassey Ferguson 6616Difference
Hitch TypeNot recordedThree-Point Hitch—
Hitch CategoryIII/IICategory 2—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT495EMassey Ferguson 6616Difference
Drive TypeNot recorded4WD—
Steering TypeNot recordedHydraulic power—
Brake TypeHydraulic Wet Disc, operated by two foot pedals that can be locked togetherNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT495EMassey Ferguson 6616Difference
Battery VoltageNot recorded12V—
Starter TypeElectronicElectric—

Emissions

SpecChallenger MT495EMassey Ferguson 6616Difference
Control SystemSCR exhaust treatmentNot recorded—

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT495EMassey Ferguson 6616Difference
TypeNot recordedCab—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 110 hp
A · 65th percentile (138 hp)B · 66th percentile (141 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 336 ci
A · 46th percentile (299 ci)B · 46th percentile (299 ci)

Cylinders

median 5.5
A · 31st percentile (4)B · 31st percentile (4)

Operating Weight

median 10,914 lb
A · 76th percentile (16,810 lb)B · 74th percentile (15,930 lb)
A · MT495EB · 6616Median Agricultural Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT495EFull spec pageMassey Ferguson 6616