Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT525E
Utility
- power
- 142 hp
- displacement
- 402 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT525E vs JCB Fastrac 2140
Image not recorded
JCBModel B
JCB Fastrac 2140
Utility
- power
- 142 hp
- displacement
- 359 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 54
ChallengerChallenger MT525E
vs
JCBJCB Fastrac 2140
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedMT525E142 hp
Fastrac 2140142 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT525E is in the 92nd percentile; Fastrac 2140 is in the 92nd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT525E higher · +43 ci (+12%)MT525E402 ci
Fastrac 2140359 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT525E is in the 90th percentile; Fastrac 2140 is in the 87th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT525E6
Fastrac 21406
Median Utility Tractor4
MT525E is in the 93rd percentile; Fastrac 2140 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ Fastrac 2140 higher · +38 (+238%)MT525E16
Fastrac 214054
Median Utility Tractor12
MT525E is in the 73rd percentile; Fastrac 2140 is in the 99th · 4,941 models
MT525E (A)Fastrac 2140 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT525E | JCB Fastrac 2140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | JCB | — |
| Model | MT525E | Fastrac 2140 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT525E | JCB Fastrac 2140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO Power | Cummins | — |
| Model | Z001B | QSB30 | — |
| Power Output | 142hp | 142hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ Fastrac 2140+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 402ci | 359ci | ▲ MT525E+43 ci · +12% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4in | ▲ MT525E+0.3 in · +7% |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 4.7in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT525E | JCB Fastrac 2140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | TechStar Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) | Partial power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT525E | JCB Fastrac 2140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 202in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 90.9in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 113in | — |
| Operating Weight | 15,200lb | 14,239lb | ▲ MT525E+961 lb · +7% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT525E | JCB Fastrac 2140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed-Center Load Sensing | Not recorded | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | 29.6gpm | Not recorded | — |
| Pressure | 2,870psi | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT525E | JCB Fastrac 2140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | 2 | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 11,750lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT525E | JCB Fastrac 2140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT525E | JCB Fastrac 2140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | 12V | Same |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | Challenger MT525E | JCB Fastrac 2140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Tier IV | Not recorded | — |
| Control System | selective catalytic reduction (SCR) | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 92nd percentile (142 hp)B · 92nd percentile (142 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 90th percentile (402 ci)B · 87th percentile (359 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 99th percentile (54)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 93rd percentile (15,200 lb)B · 92nd percentile (14,239 lb)
A · MT525EB · Fastrac 2140Median Utility Tractor