Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT525E
Utility
- power
- 142 hp
- displacement
- 402 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT525E vs Kubota M6142
KubotaModel B
Kubota M6142
Utility
- power
- 142 hp
- displacement
- 374 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
ChallengerChallenger MT525E
vs
KubotaKubota M6142
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedMT525E142 hp
M6142142 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT525E is in the 92nd percentile; M6142 is in the 92nd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT525E higher · +28 ci (+7%)MT525E402 ci
M6142374 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT525E is in the 90th percentile; M6142 is in the 89th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MT525E higher · +2 (+50%)MT525E6
M61424
Median Utility Tractor4
MT525E is in the 93rd percentile; M6142 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ M6142 higher · +8 (+50%)MT525E16
M614224
Median Utility Tractor12
MT525E is in the 73rd percentile; M6142 is in the 92nd · 4,941 models
MT525E (A)M6142 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT525E | Kubota M6142 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Kubota | — |
| Model | MT525E | M6142 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT525E | Kubota M6142 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO Power | Kubota | — |
| Model | Z001B | V6108 | — |
| Power Output | 142hp | 142hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 1,900RPM | ▲ MT525E+200 RPM · +11% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ MT525E+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 402ci | 374ci | ▲ MT525E+28 ci · +7% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.7in | ▲ M6142+0.4 in · +9% |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 5.5in | ▲ M6142+0.8 in · +17% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT525E | Kubota M6142 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | TechStar Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) | 24-speed eight-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT525E | Kubota M6142 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 182in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 83.1in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 114in | — |
| Operating Weight | 15,200lb | 13,228lb | ▲ MT525E+1,972 lb · +15% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT525E | Kubota M6142 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed-Center Load Sensing | Closed-center load-sensing | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | 29.6gpm | Not recorded | — |
| Pressure | 2,870psi | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT525E | Kubota M6142 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | 2 | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 11,750lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT525E | Kubota M6142 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT525E | Kubota M6142 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | Challenger MT525E | Kubota M6142 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Tier IV | Not recorded | — |
| Control System | selective catalytic reduction (SCR) | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT525E | Kubota M6142 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 92nd percentile (142 hp)B · 92nd percentile (142 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 90th percentile (402 ci)B · 89th percentile (374 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 92nd percentile (24)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 93rd percentile (15,200 lb)B · 91st percentile (13,228 lb)
A · MT525EB · M6142Median Utility Tractor