Head to head · Row Crop

Challenger MT535 vs Challenger MT635

Challenger MT535 Tractor
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT535

Row Crop

power
Not recorded
displacement
365 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
32
Full MT535 specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT635

Row Crop

power
Not recorded
displacement
449 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
18
Full MT635 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT535
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT635

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 806–1,417

Engine Displacement

▲ MT635 higher · +84 ci (+23%)
MT535365 ci
MT635449 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

MT535 is in the 43rd percentile; MT635 is in the 77th · 1,409 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT5356
MT6356
Median Row Crop Tractor6

MT535 is in the 50th percentile; MT635 is in the 50th · 1,417 models

Forward Gears

▲ MT535 higher · +14 (+78%)
MT53532
MT63518
Median Row Crop Tractor16

MT535 is in the 91st percentile; MT635 is in the 61st · 1,200 models

Operating Weight

▲ MT635 higher · +9,375 lb (+98%)
MT5359,600 lb
MT63518,975 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb

MT535 is in the 29th percentile; MT635 is in the 81st · 1,350 models

MT535 (A)MT635 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT535Challenger MT635Difference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT535MT635—
CategoryRow CropRow CropSame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT535Challenger MT635Difference
ManufacturerCaterpillarSisu—
Model3056Sisu H18085—
Rated RPM2,200RPM2,200RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement365ci449ci▲ MT635+84 ci · +23%
Bore3.9in4.3in▲ MT635+0.4 in · +10%
Stroke5in5.3in▲ MT635+0.3 in · +6%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT535Challenger MT635Difference
TypePartial Power ShiftPower shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT535Challenger MT635Difference
Length179in203in▲ MT635+24 in · +13%
Width88in98.2in▲ MT635+10.2 in · +12%
Height109in121in▲ MT635+12 in · +11%
Operating Weight9,600lb18,975lb▲ MT635+9,375 lb · +98%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT535Challenger MT635Difference
System TypeClosed Center Pressure Flow Compensated (PFC)Closed center pressure flow compensated (PFC)Same
Pump Flow CapacityNot recorded29.7gpm—
Steering TypePowerPowerSame

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecChallenger MT535Challenger MT635Difference
Speed 1Not recorded540rpm—
Speed 2Not recorded1,000rpm—

Tires

SpecChallenger MT535Challenger MT635Difference
Front Tire SizeNot recorded14.9R30—
Rear Tire SizeNot recorded18.4R42—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT535Challenger MT635Difference
Hitch TypeIIType III—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT535Challenger MT635Difference
Chassis Type4x2 2WD4x4 MFWD 4WD—
Drive Type2WD4WD—
Steering TypePowerPowerSame
Brake TypeHydraulic wet discMultiple wet disc, hydraulically operated—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT535Challenger MT635Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT535Challenger MT635Difference
TypeOptional CabCab—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 43rd percentile (365 ci)B · 77th percentile (449 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 91st percentile (32)B · 61st percentile (18)

Operating Weight

median 12,307 lb
A · 29th percentile (9,600 lb)B · 81st percentile (18,975 lb)

Length

median 180 in
A · 50th percentile (179 in)B · 78th percentile (203 in)
A · MT535B · MT635Median Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT535Full spec pageChallenger MT635