ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT535
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 365 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 32
Head to head · Row Crop
Challenger MT535 vs Ford 7810
FordModel B
Ford 7810
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 401 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 8
ChallengerChallenger MT535
vs
FordFord 7810
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Displacement
▲ 7810 higher · +36 ci (+10%)MT535365 ci
7810401 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
MT535 is in the 43rd percentile; 7810 is in the 51st · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT5356
78106
Median Row Crop Tractor6
MT535 is in the 50th percentile; 7810 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT535 higher · +24 (+300%)MT53532
78108
Median Row Crop Tractor16
MT535 is in the 91st percentile; 7810 is in the 16th · 1,200 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT535 higher · +1,850 lb (+24%)MT5359,600 lb
78107,750 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
MT535 is in the 29th percentile; 7810 is in the 19th · 1,350 models
MT535 (A)7810 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT535 | Ford 7810 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Ford | — |
| Model | MT535 | 7810 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT535 | Ford 7810 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Ford | — |
| Model | 3056 | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ MT535+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 365ci | 401ci | ▲ 7810+36 ci · +10% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 4.4in | ▲ 7810+0.5 in · +13% |
| Stroke | 5in | 4.4in | ▲ MT535+0.6 in · +14% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT535 | Ford 7810 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partial Power Shift | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT535 | Ford 7810 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 179in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 88in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 109in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 9,600lb | 7,750lb | ▲ MT535+1,850 lb · +24% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT535 | Ford 7810 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensated (PFC) | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT535 | Ford 7810 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT535 | Ford 7810 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT535 | Ford 7810 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT535 | Ford 7810 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 4gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT535 | Ford 7810 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Optional Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 43rd percentile (365 ci)B · 51st percentile (401 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 91st percentile (32)B · 16th percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 29th percentile (9,600 lb)B · 19th percentile (7,750 lb)
A · MT535B · 7810Median Row Crop Tractor