Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT535B MFWD
Utility
- power
- 110 hp
- displacement
- 403 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT535B MFWD vs Mahindra 6065
Image not recorded
MahindraModel B
Mahindra 6065
Utility
- power
- 62 hp
- displacement
- 162 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 15
ChallengerChallenger MT535B MFWD
vs
MahindraMahindra 6065
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT535B MFWD higher · +48 hp (+77%)MT535B MFWD110 hp
606562 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT535B MFWD is in the 87th percentile; 6065 is in the 56th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT535B MFWD higher · +241 ci (+149%)MT535B MFWD403 ci
6065162 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT535B MFWD is in the 90th percentile; 6065 is in the 43rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MT535B MFWD higher · +3 (+100%)MT535B MFWD6
60653
Median Utility Tractor4
MT535B MFWD is in the 93rd percentile; 6065 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT535B MFWD higher · +5,386 lb (+88%)MT535B MFWD11,482 lb
60656,096 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
MT535B MFWD is in the 89th percentile; 6065 is in the 58th · 5,107 models
MT535B MFWD (A)6065 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT535B MFWD | Mahindra 6065 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Mahindra | — |
| Model | MT535B MFWD | 6065 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT535B MFWD | Mahindra 6065 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | ACERT | Mahindra | — |
| Model | C6.6 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 110hp | 62hp | ▲ MT535B MFWD+48 hp · +77% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 3 | ▲ MT535B MFWD+3 · +100% |
| Displacement | 403ci | 162ci | ▲ MT535B MFWD+241 ci · +149% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.8in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4.8in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT535B MFWD | Mahindra 6065 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Auto Power | Power shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT535B MFWD | Mahindra 6065 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 184in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 81.6in | 73.2in | ▲ MT535B MFWD+8.4 in · +11% |
| Height | 113in | 104in | ▲ MT535B MFWD+9 in · +9% |
| Operating Weight | 11,482lb | 6,096lb | ▲ MT535B MFWD+5,386 lb · +88% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT535B MFWD | Mahindra 6065 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT535B MFWD | Mahindra 6065 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | 3-Point | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 10,915lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT535B MFWD | Mahindra 6065 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT535B MFWD | Mahindra 6065 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Start | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT535B MFWD | Mahindra 6065 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 6.8gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT535B MFWD | Mahindra 6065 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS/FOPS | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 87th percentile (110 hp)B · 56th percentile (62 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 90th percentile (403 ci)B · 43rd percentile (162 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 89th percentile (11,482 lb)B · 58th percentile (6,096 lb)
Width
median 66 inA · 84th percentile (81.6 in)B · 68th percentile (73.2 in)
A · MT535B MFWDB · 6065Median Utility Tractor