Head to head · Row Crop

Challenger MT545 vs Challenger MT635

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT545

Row Crop

power
Not recorded
displacement
365 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
32
Full MT545 specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT635

Row Crop

power
Not recorded
displacement
449 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
18
Full MT635 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT545
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT635

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 806–1,417

Engine Displacement

▲ MT635 higher · +84 ci (+23%)
MT545365 ci
MT635449 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

MT545 is in the 43rd percentile; MT635 is in the 77th · 1,409 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT5456
MT6356
Median Row Crop Tractor6

MT545 is in the 50th percentile; MT635 is in the 50th · 1,417 models

Forward Gears

▲ MT545 higher · +14 (+78%)
MT54532
MT63518
Median Row Crop Tractor16

MT545 is in the 91st percentile; MT635 is in the 61st · 1,200 models

Operating Weight

▲ MT635 higher · +8,893 lb (+88%)
MT54510,082 lb
MT63518,975 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb

MT545 is in the 32nd percentile; MT635 is in the 81st · 1,350 models

MT545 (A)MT635 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT545Challenger MT635Difference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT545MT635—
CategoryRow CropRow CropSame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT545Challenger MT635Difference
ManufacturerCaterpillarSisu—
Model3056Sisu H18085—
Rated RPM2,200RPM2,200RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement365ci449ci▲ MT635+84 ci · +23%
Bore3.9in4.3in▲ MT635+0.4 in · +10%
Stroke5in5.3in▲ MT635+0.3 in · +6%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT545Challenger MT635Difference
TypePartial power shiftPower shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT545Challenger MT635Difference
Length179in203in▲ MT635+24 in · +13%
Width88in98.2in▲ MT635+10.2 in · +12%
Height109in121in▲ MT635+12 in · +11%
Operating Weight10,082lb18,975lb▲ MT635+8,893 lb · +88%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT545Challenger MT635Difference
System TypeClosed center pressure flow compensated (PFC)Closed center pressure flow compensated (PFC)Same
Pump Flow CapacityNot recorded29.7gpm—
Steering TypePowerPowerSame

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecChallenger MT545Challenger MT635Difference
Speed 1Not recorded540rpm—
Speed 2Not recorded1,000rpm—

Tires

SpecChallenger MT545Challenger MT635Difference
Front Tire SizeNot recorded14.9R30—
Rear Tire SizeNot recorded18.4R42—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT545Challenger MT635Difference
Hitch TypeThree-Point HitchType III—
Hitch CategoryIINot recorded—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT545Challenger MT635Difference
Chassis Type4x2 2WD4x4 MFWD 4WD—
Drive Type2WD4WD—
Steering TypePowerPowerSame
Brake TypeHydraulic wet discMultiple wet disc, hydraulically operated—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT545Challenger MT635Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT545Challenger MT635Difference
TypeCabCabSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 43rd percentile (365 ci)B · 77th percentile (449 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 91st percentile (32)B · 61st percentile (18)

Operating Weight

median 12,307 lb
A · 32nd percentile (10,082 lb)B · 81st percentile (18,975 lb)

Length

median 180 in
A · 50th percentile (179 in)B · 78th percentile (203 in)
A · MT545B · MT635Median Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT545Full spec pageChallenger MT635