Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT545E
Utility
- power
- 165 hp
- displacement
- 402 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 24
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT545E vs Massey Ferguson 396
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 396
Utility
- power
- 89.4 hp
- displacement
- 365 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
ChallengerChallenger MT545E
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 396
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT545E higher · +75.6 hp (+85%)MT545E165 hp
39689.4 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT545E is in the 94th percentile; 396 is in the 77th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT545E higher · +37 ci (+10%)MT545E402 ci
396365 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT545E is in the 90th percentile; 396 is in the 88th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT545E6
3966
Median Utility Tractor4
MT545E is in the 93rd percentile; 396 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT545E higher · +12 (+100%)MT545E24
39612
Median Utility Tractor12
MT545E is in the 92nd percentile; 396 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
MT545E (A)396 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT545E | Massey Ferguson 396 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | MT545E | 396 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT545E | Massey Ferguson 396 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO S.A. | Perkins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 1006 | — |
| Power Output | 165hp | 89.4hp | ▲ MT545E+75.6 hp · +85% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ 396+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 402ci | 365ci | ▲ MT545E+37 ci · +10% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 3.9in | ▲ MT545E+0.4 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 5in | ▲ 396+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT545E | Massey Ferguson 396 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | CVT | Selective gear fixed ratio | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT545E | Massey Ferguson 396 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | Not recorded | 87.2in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 108in | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT545E | Massey Ferguson 396 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed-center load sensing | Open Center | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | 30.2gpm | 7.1gpm | ▲ MT545E+23.1 gpm · +325% |
| Pressure | 2,875psi | 3,050psi | ▲ 396+175 psi · +6% |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT545E | Massey Ferguson 396 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT545E | Massey Ferguson 396 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT545E | Massey Ferguson 396 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | Challenger MT545E | Massey Ferguson 396 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control System | Selective Catalytic Reduction | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT545E | Massey Ferguson 396 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 5.3gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT545E | Massey Ferguson 396 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS / Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 94th percentile (165 hp)B · 77th percentile (89.4 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 90th percentile (402 ci)B · 88th percentile (365 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 92nd percentile (24)B · 50th percentile (12)
A · MT545EB · 396Median Utility Tractor