Head to head · Agricultural

Challenger MT555E vs Massey Ferguson 3075

Challenger MT555E Tractor
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT555E

Agricultural

power
170 hp
displacement
402 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full MT555E specs
Massey Ferguson 3075 Tractor
Massey FergusonModel B

Massey Ferguson 3075

Utility

power
86.1 hp
displacement
243 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
32
Full 3075 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT555E
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 3075

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural

n = 93–1,130

Engine Power

▲ MT555E higher · +83.9 hp (+97%)
MT555E170 hp
307586.1 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp

MT555E is in the 74th percentile; 3075 is in the 33rd · 1,028 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT555E higher · +159 ci (+65%)
MT555E402 ci
3075243 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci

MT555E is in the 66th percentile; 3075 is in the 25th · 1,083 models

Cylinders

▲ MT555E higher · +2 (+50%)
MT555E6
30754
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5

MT555E is in the 74th percentile; 3075 is in the 31st · 1,130 models

Operating Weight

▲ MT555E higher · +8,620 lb (+89%)
MT555E18,355 lb
30759,735 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb

MT555E is in the 79th percentile; 3075 is in the 43rd · 971 models

MT555E (A)3075 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT555EMassey Ferguson 3075Difference
ManufacturerChallengerMassey Ferguson—
ModelMT555E3075—
CategoryAgriculturalUtility—

Engine

SpecChallenger MT555EMassey Ferguson 3075Difference
ManufacturerAGCO PowerPerkins—
Power Output170hp86.1hp▲ MT555E+83.9 hp · +97%
Rated RPM2,100RPM2,200RPM▲ 3075+100 RPM · +5%
Cylinders64▲ MT555E+2 · +50%
Displacement402ci243ci▲ MT555E+159 ci · +65%
Bore4.3inNot recorded—
Stroke4.7inNot recorded—

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT555EMassey Ferguson 3075Difference
TypeContinuously Variable Transmission (CVT)Not recorded—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT555EMassey Ferguson 3075Difference
Operating Weight18,355lb9,735lb▲ MT555E+8,620 lb · +89%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT555EMassey Ferguson 3075Difference
System TypeDirect engine driveNot recorded—
Pump Flow Capacity32.9gpm13.1gpm▲ MT555E+19.8 gpm · +151%
Pressure2,110psi2,395psi▲ 3075+285 psi · +14%
Steering TypeHydrostaticNot recorded—

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecChallenger MT555EMassey Ferguson 3075Difference
Speed 1540rpmNot recorded—
Speed 21,000rpmNot recorded—
Power RatingNot recorded86.1hp—

Tires

SpecChallenger MT555EMassey Ferguson 3075Difference
Front Tire Size480/70R30Not recorded—
Rear Tire Size620/70R42Not recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT555EMassey Ferguson 3075Difference
Hitch TypeThree-Point HitchThree-Point HitchSame
Hitch CategoryIIIII—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame
Hitch Capacity15,105lb7,350lb▲ MT555E+7,755 lb · +106%

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT555EMassey Ferguson 3075Difference
Chassis TypeFront-wheel assistFWA (Front Wheel Assist) / 2WD—
Drive TypeNot recorded4WD—
Steering TypeHydrostaticNot recorded—
Brake TypeMultiple wet disc hydraulically operatedNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT555EMassey Ferguson 3075Difference
Starter TypeElectricNot recorded—

Capacities

SpecChallenger MT555EMassey Ferguson 3075Difference
CoolantNot recorded5.1gal—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 110 hp
A · 74th percentile (170 hp)B · 33rd percentile (86.1 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 336 ci
A · 66th percentile (402 ci)B · 25th percentile (243 ci)

Cylinders

median 5.5
A · 74th percentile (6)B · 31st percentile (4)

Operating Weight

median 10,914 lb
A · 79th percentile (18,355 lb)B · 43rd percentile (9,735 lb)

3-Point Hitch Capacity

median 12,126 lb
A · 64th percentile (15,105 lb)B · 21st percentile (7,350 lb)
A · MT555EB · 3075Median Agricultural Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT555EFull spec pageMassey Ferguson 3075