
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT555E
Agricultural
- power
- 170 hp
- displacement
- 402 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural

Agricultural
Agricultural
How they compare
MT555E is in the 74th percentile; 8737 is in the 81st · 1,028 models
MT555E is in the 66th percentile; 8737 is in the 88th · 1,083 models
MT555E is in the 74th percentile; 8737 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
MT555E is in the 79th percentile; 8737 is in the 94th · 971 models
Full comparison
| Spec | Challenger MT555E | Massey Ferguson 8737 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | MT555E | 8737 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
| Spec | Challenger MT555E | Massey Ferguson 8737 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO Power | AGCO Power | Same |
| Power Output | 170hp | 205hp | ▲ 8737+35 hp · +21% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 402ci | 513ci | ▲ 8737+111 ci · +28% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.4in | ▲ 8737+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 5.7in | ▲ 8737+1 in · +21% |
| Spec | Challenger MT555E | Massey Ferguson 8737 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) | Continuously variable transmission (CVT) | Same |
| Spec | Challenger MT555E | Massey Ferguson 8737 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 219in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 141in | — |
| Operating Weight | 18,355lb | 28,710lb | ▲ 8737+10,355 lb · +56% |
| Spec | Challenger MT555E | Massey Ferguson 8737 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Direct engine drive | Closed center load sensing (CCLS) | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | 32.9gpm | 53.1gpm | ▲ 8737+20.2 gpm · +61% |
| Pressure | 2,110psi | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Spec | Challenger MT555E | Massey Ferguson 8737 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | Challenger MT555E | Massey Ferguson 8737 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 480/70R30 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 620/70R42 | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | Challenger MT555E | Massey Ferguson 8737 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tread Width | Not recorded | 61.5in | — |
| Rear Tread | Not recorded | 76in | — |
| Front Tread Adjustment | Not recorded | 61.5 to 89.4 in | — |
| Rear Tread Adjustment | Not recorded | 76.0 to 89.1 in | — |
| Spec | Challenger MT555E | Massey Ferguson 8737 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Category III/IVN | — |
| Hitch Category | III | Category III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 15,105lb | 22,460lb | ▲ 8737+7,355 lb · +49% |
| Spec | Challenger MT555E | Massey Ferguson 8737 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Front-wheel assist | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Multiple wet disc hydraulically operated | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | Challenger MT555E | Massey Ferguson 8737 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | 12 volt | — |
| Spec | Challenger MT555E | Massey Ferguson 8737 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context