Head to head · Utility

Challenger MT535D vs Massey Ferguson 8737

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT535D

Utility

power
144 hp
displacement
403 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full MT535D specs
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B

Massey Ferguson 8737

Agricultural

power
205 hp
displacement
513 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full 8737 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT535D
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 8737

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 1,083–5,720

Engine Power

▲ 8737 higher · +61 hp (+42%)
MT535D144 hp
8737205 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

MT535D is in the 92nd percentile; 8737 is in the 95th · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ 8737 higher · +110 ci (+27%)
MT535D403 ci
8737513 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

MT535D is in the 90th percentile; 8737 is in the 94th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT535D6
87376
Median Utility Tractor4

MT535D is in the 93rd percentile; 8737 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models

Operating Weight

▲ 8737 higher · +11,955 lb (+71%)
MT535D16,755 lb
873728,710 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb

MT535D is in the 94th percentile; 8737 is in the 97th · 5,107 models

MT535D (A)8737 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT535DMassey Ferguson 8737Difference
ManufacturerChallengerMassey Ferguson—
ModelMT535D8737—
CategoryUtilityAgricultural—

Engine

SpecChallenger MT535DMassey Ferguson 8737Difference
ManufacturerAGCO PowerAGCO PowerSame
Power Output144hp205hp▲ 8737+61 hp · +42%
Rated RPM2,100RPM2,100RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement403ci513ci▲ 8737+110 ci · +27%
Bore4.3in4.4in▲ 8737+0.1 in · +2%
Stroke4.7in5.7in▲ 8737+1 in · +21%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT535DMassey Ferguson 8737Difference
TypeContinuously Variable Transmission (CVT)Continuously variable transmission (CVT)Same

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT535DMassey Ferguson 8737Difference
LengthNot recorded219in—
HeightNot recorded141in—
Operating Weight16,755lb28,710lb▲ 8737+11,955 lb · +71%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT535DMassey Ferguson 8737Difference
System TypeClosed Center Load Sensing (CCLS)Closed center load sensing (CCLS)Same
Pump Flow Capacity29.4gpm53.1gpm▲ 8737+23.7 gpm · +81%
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerHydrostatic powerSame

Tread Width

SpecChallenger MT535DMassey Ferguson 8737Difference
Front Tread Width60.2in61.5in▲ 8737+1.3 in · +2%
Rear Tread61.7in76in▲ 8737+14.3 in · +23%
Front Tread AdjustmentNot recorded61.5 to 89.4 in—
Rear Tread AdjustmentNot recorded76.0 to 89.1 in—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT535DMassey Ferguson 8737Difference
Hitch TypeNot recordedCategory III/IVN—
Hitch CategoryIII/IICategory III—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame
Hitch Capacity11,755lb22,460lb▲ 8737+10,705 lb · +91%

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT535DMassey Ferguson 8737Difference
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerHydrostatic powerSame

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT535DMassey Ferguson 8737Difference
Starter TypeElectric Starter, 12 volt12 volt—

Emissions

SpecChallenger MT535DMassey Ferguson 8737Difference
StandardInterim Tier IVNot recorded—
Control SystemSelective Catalytic Reduction (SCR)Not recorded—

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT535DMassey Ferguson 8737Difference
TypeNot recordedCab—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 92nd percentile (144 hp)B · 95th percentile (205 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 90th percentile (403 ci)B · 94th percentile (513 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 94th percentile (16,755 lb)B · 97th percentile (28,710 lb)

3-Point Hitch Capacity

median 3,197 lb
A · 91st percentile (11,755 lb)B · 99th percentile (22,460 lb)
A · MT535DB · 8737Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT535DFull spec pageMassey Ferguson 8737