Image not recorded
SchluterModel A
Schluter Euro Trac 2000 LS
Utility
- power
- 200 hp
- displacement
- 419 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 24
Head to head · Utility
Utility
Agricultural
How they compare
Euro Trac 2000 LS is in the 95th percentile; 18345 is in the 94th · 5,383 models
Euro Trac 2000 LS is in the 92nd percentile; 18345 is in the 93rd · 5,580 models
Euro Trac 2000 LS is in the 95th percentile; 18345 is in the 95th · 4,659 models
Euro Trac 2000 LS is in the 95th percentile; 18345 is in the 96th · 4,321 models
Full comparison
| Spec | Schluter Euro Trac 2000 LS | Zetor 18345 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Schluter | Zetor | — |
| Model | Euro Trac 2000 LS | 18345 | — |
| Category | Utility | Agricultural | — |
| Spec | Schluter Euro Trac 2000 LS | Zetor 18345 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | MAN | Not recorded | — |
| Model | D 0826 LUE 501 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 200hp | 180hp | ▲ Euro Trac 2000 LS+20 hp · +11% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | Not recorded | — |
| Displacement | 419ci | 445ci | ▲ 18345+26 ci · +6% |
| Bore | 4.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.9in | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | Schluter Euro Trac 2000 LS | Zetor 18345 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | Schluter Euro Trac 2000 LS | Zetor 18345 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 211in | 209in | ▲ Euro Trac 2000 LS+2 in · <1% |
| Width | Not recorded | 91in | — |
| Height | 122in | 127in | ▲ 18345+5 in · +4% |
| Spec | Schluter Euro Trac 2000 LS | Zetor 18345 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | Schluter Euro Trac 2000 LS | Zetor 18345 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | 3 | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | Schluter Euro Trac 2000 LS | Zetor 18345 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Category context