Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT595D
Agricultural
- power
- 234 hp
- displacement
- 449 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 24
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT595D vs Challenger MT645B
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT645B
Agricultural
- power
- 235 hp
- displacement
- 449 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT595D
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT645B
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ MT645B higher · +1 hp (<1%)MT595D234 hp
MT645B235 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT595D is in the 86th percentile; MT645B is in the 86th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedMT595D449 ci
MT645B449 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT595D is in the 79th percentile; MT645B is in the 79th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT595D6
MT645B6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT595D is in the 74th percentile; MT645B is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT645B higher · +285 lb (+1%)MT595D19,310 lb
MT645B19,595 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT595D is in the 81st percentile; MT645B is in the 82nd · 971 models
MT595D (A)MT645B (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT595D | Challenger MT645B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | MT595D | MT645B | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT595D | Challenger MT645B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Sisu AGCO Power | Sisu | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 74ETA | — |
| Power Output | 234hp | 235hp | ▲ MT645B+1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ MT645B+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 449ci | 449ci | Same |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.3in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 5.3in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT595D | Challenger MT645B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Selective gear fixed ratio with partial (6) range operator controlled powershift | continuously variable transmission (CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT595D | Challenger MT645B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 206in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 118in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 124in | — |
| Operating Weight | 19,310lb | 19,595lb | ▲ MT645B+285 lb · +1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT595D | Challenger MT645B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Direct engine drive | Pressure Flow Compensated (PFC) | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger MT595D | Challenger MT645B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 540/65R30 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 650/65R42 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT595D | Challenger MT645B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | III | III | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT595D | Challenger MT645B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | Front wheel assist | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT595D | Challenger MT645B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | 12 volt | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT595D | Challenger MT645B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 8.9gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 86th percentile (234 hp)B · 86th percentile (235 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 79th percentile (449 ci)B · 79th percentile (449 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 81st percentile (19,310 lb)B · 82nd percentile (19,595 lb)
A · MT595DB · MT645BMedian Agricultural Tractor