Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT645B
Agricultural
- power
- 235 hp
- displacement
- 449 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT645B vs Claas Atles 926
Image not recorded
ClaasModel B
Claas Atles 926
Agricultural
- power
- 232 hp
- displacement
- 436 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
ChallengerChallenger MT645B
vs
ClaasClaas Atles 926
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ MT645B higher · +3 hp (+1%)MT645B235 hp
Atles 926232 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT645B is in the 86th percentile; Atles 926 is in the 85th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT645B higher · +13 ci (+3%)MT645B449 ci
Atles 926436 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT645B is in the 79th percentile; Atles 926 is in the 78th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT645B6
Atles 9266
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT645B is in the 74th percentile; Atles 926 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT645B higher · +94 lb (<1%)MT645B19,595 lb
Atles 92619,501 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT645B is in the 82nd percentile; Atles 926 is in the 82nd · 971 models
MT645B (A)Atles 926 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT645B | Claas Atles 926 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Claas | — |
| Model | MT645B | Atles 926 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT645B | Claas Atles 926 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Sisu | Deutz | — |
| Model | 74ETA | BF6L1013FC | — |
| Power Output | 235hp | 232hp | ▲ MT645B+3 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,000RPM | ▲ MT645B+200 RPM · +10% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 449ci | 436ci | ▲ MT645B+13 ci · +3% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.3in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 5.1in | ▲ MT645B+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT645B | Claas Atles 926 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | continuously variable transmission (CVT) | 18-speed | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT645B | Claas Atles 926 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 206in | 198in | ▲ MT645B+8 in · +4% |
| Width | 118in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 124in | 126in | ▲ Atles 926+2 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 19,595lb | 19,501lb | ▲ MT645B+94 lb · <1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT645B | Claas Atles 926 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Pressure Flow Compensated (PFC) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT645B | Claas Atles 926 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | III | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT645B | Claas Atles 926 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT645B | Claas Atles 926 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT645B | Claas Atles 926 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 8.9gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 86th percentile (235 hp)B · 85th percentile (232 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 79th percentile (449 ci)B · 78th percentile (436 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 82nd percentile (19,595 lb)B · 82nd percentile (19,501 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 82nd percentile (206 in)B · 77th percentile (198 in)
A · MT645BB · Atles 926Median Agricultural Tractor