Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT655B
Agricultural
- power
- 260 hp
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT655B vs Claas Xerion 2500
ClaasModel B
Claas Xerion 2500
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 250 hp
- displacement
- 530 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT655B
vs
ClaasClaas Xerion 2500
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ MT655B higher · +10 hp (+4%)MT655B260 hp
Xerion 2500250 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT655B is in the 89th percentile; Xerion 2500 is in the 88th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Xerion 2500 higher · +17 ci (+3%)MT655B513 ci
Xerion 2500530 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT655B is in the 88th percentile; Xerion 2500 is in the 89th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT655B6
Xerion 25006
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT655B is in the 74th percentile; Xerion 2500 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ Xerion 2500 higher · +1,398 lb (+7%)MT655B19,550 lb
Xerion 250020,948 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT655B is in the 82nd percentile; Xerion 2500 is in the 87th · 971 models
MT655B (A)Xerion 2500 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Claas Xerion 2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Claas | — |
| Model | MT655B | Xerion 2500 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Four-Wheel Drive | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Claas Xerion 2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Sisu | Perkins | — |
| Model | 84ETA | 1306 | — |
| Power Output | 260hp | 250hp | ▲ MT655B+10 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ MT655B+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 513ci | 530ci | ▲ Xerion 2500+17 ci · +3% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.6in | ▲ Xerion 2500+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 5.3in | ▲ MT655B+0.4 in · +8% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Claas Xerion 2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | continuously variable transmission (CVT) | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Claas Xerion 2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 206in | 248in | ▲ Xerion 2500+42 in · +20% |
| Width | 118in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 124in | 138in | ▲ Xerion 2500+14 in · +11% |
| Operating Weight | 19,550lb | 20,948lb | ▲ Xerion 2500+1,398 lb · +7% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Claas Xerion 2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | pressure flow compensated (PFC) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Claas Xerion 2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Claas Xerion 2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Claas Xerion 2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Claas Xerion 2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 8.9gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 89th percentile (260 hp)B · 88th percentile (250 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 88th percentile (513 ci)B · 89th percentile (530 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 82nd percentile (19,550 lb)B · 87th percentile (20,948 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 82nd percentile (206 in)B · 96th percentile (248 in)
A · MT655BB · Xerion 2500Median Agricultural Tractor