Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT665C
Agricultural
- power
- 290 hp
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT665C vs Fendt 940 Vario MT
Image not recorded
FendtModel B
Fendt 940 Vario MT
Crawler
- power
- 400 hp
- displacement
- 598 ci
- Cylinders
- 7
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT665C
vs
FendtFendt 940 Vario MT
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ 940 Vario MT higher · +110 hp (+38%)MT665C290 hp
940 Vario MT400 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT665C is in the 93rd percentile; 940 Vario MT is in the 97th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 940 Vario MT higher · +85 ci (+17%)MT665C513 ci
940 Vario MT598 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT665C is in the 88th percentile; 940 Vario MT is in the 92nd · 1,083 models
Cylinders
▲ 940 Vario MT higher · +1 (+17%)MT665C6
940 Vario MT7
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT665C is in the 74th percentile; 940 Vario MT is in the 98th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ 940 Vario MT higher · +7,648 lb (+30%)MT665C25,795 lb
940 Vario MT33,443 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT665C is in the 93rd percentile; 940 Vario MT is in the 96th · 971 models
MT665C (A)940 Vario MT (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT665C | Fendt 940 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Fendt | — |
| Model | MT665C | 940 Vario MT | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Crawler | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT665C | Fendt 940 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Sisu Diesel | AGCO Power | — |
| Model | 84CTA | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 290hp | 400hp | ▲ 940 Vario MT+110 hp · +38% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 1,450RPM | ▲ MT665C+750 RPM · +52% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 7 | ▲ 940 Vario MT+1 · +17% |
| Displacement | 513ci | 598ci | ▲ 940 Vario MT+85 ci · +17% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.4in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 5.7in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT665C | Fendt 940 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously variable transmission (Techstar CVT) | continuously-variable transmission (CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT665C | Fendt 940 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 223in | 241in | ▲ 940 Vario MT+18 in · +8% |
| Width | Not recorded | 98.5in | — |
| Height | 133in | 138in | ▲ 940 Vario MT+5 in · +4% |
| Operating Weight | 25,795lb | 33,443lb | ▲ 940 Vario MT+7,648 lb · +30% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT665C | Fendt 940 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Load Sensing | Closed center | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT665C | Fendt 940 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | IVN/III | — |
| Hitch Category | III | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 26,460lb | 41,000lb | ▲ 940 Vario MT+14,540 lb · +55% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT665C | Fendt 940 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | Tracked | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | Track Drive | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT665C | Fendt 940 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT665C | Fendt 940 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 93rd percentile (290 hp)B · 97th percentile (400 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 88th percentile (513 ci)B · 92nd percentile (598 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 98th percentile (7)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 93rd percentile (25,795 lb)B · 96th percentile (33,443 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 91st percentile (223 in)B · 95th percentile (241 in)
A · MT665CB · 940 Vario MTMedian Agricultural Tractor