Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT665C
Agricultural
- power
- 290 hp
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT665C vs Challenger MT765E
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT765E
Articulated
- power
- 405 hp
- displacement
- 599 ci
- Cylinders
- 7
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger MT665C
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT765E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ MT765E higher · +115 hp (+40%)MT665C290 hp
MT765E405 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT665C is in the 93rd percentile; MT765E is in the 97th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT765E higher · +86 ci (+17%)MT665C513 ci
MT765E599 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT665C is in the 88th percentile; MT765E is in the 92nd · 1,083 models
Cylinders
▲ MT765E higher · +1 (+17%)MT665C6
MT765E7
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT665C is in the 74th percentile; MT765E is in the 98th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT765E higher · +7,440 lb (+29%)MT665C25,795 lb
MT765E33,235 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT665C is in the 93rd percentile; MT765E is in the 96th · 971 models
MT665C (A)MT765E (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT665C | Challenger MT765E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | MT665C | MT765E | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Articulated | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT665C | Challenger MT765E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Sisu Diesel | AGCO POWER | — |
| Model | 84CTA | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 290hp | 405hp | ▲ MT765E+115 hp · +40% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ MT665C+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 7 | ▲ MT765E+1 · +17% |
| Displacement | 513ci | 599ci | ▲ MT765E+86 ci · +17% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.4in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 5.7in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT665C | Challenger MT765E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously variable transmission (Techstar CVT) | Selective gear fixed ratio with full range operator-controlled power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT665C | Challenger MT765E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 223in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 120in | — |
| Height | 133in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 25,795lb | 33,235lb | ▲ MT765E+7,440 lb · +29% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT665C | Challenger MT765E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Load Sensing | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Electro-Hydraulic Differential | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT665C | Challenger MT765E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Cat 3 | — |
| Hitch Category | III | IVN/III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 26,460lb | 39,000lb | ▲ MT765E+12,540 lb · +47% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT665C | Challenger MT765E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Electro-Hydraulic Differential | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet multiple disc hydraulically actuated by foot pedal | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT665C | Challenger MT765E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 93rd percentile (290 hp)B · 97th percentile (405 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 88th percentile (513 ci)B · 92nd percentile (599 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 98th percentile (7)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 93rd percentile (25,795 lb)B · 96th percentile (33,235 lb)
3-Point Hitch Capacity
median 12,126 lbA · 95th percentile (26,460 lb)B · 99th percentile (39,000 lb)
A · MT665CB · MT765EMedian Agricultural Tractor