Head to head · Agricultural

Challenger MT665D vs Challenger MT755C

Challenger MT665D Tractor
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT665D

Agricultural

power
299 hp
displacement
514 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full MT665D specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT755C

Agricultural

power
301 hp
displacement
537 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT755C specs
ChallengerChallenger MT665D
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT755C

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural

n = 795–1,130

Engine Power

▲ MT755C higher · +2 hp (<1%)
MT665D299 hp
MT755C301 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp

MT665D is in the 93rd percentile; MT755C is in the 94th · 1,028 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT755C higher · +23 ci (+4%)
MT665D514 ci
MT755C537 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci

MT665D is in the 88th percentile; MT755C is in the 89th · 1,083 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT665D6
MT755C6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5

MT665D is in the 74th percentile; MT755C is in the 74th · 1,130 models

Operating Weight

▲ MT755C higher · +4,830 lb (+19%)
MT665D25,365 lb
MT755C30,195 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb

MT665D is in the 92nd percentile; MT755C is in the 94th · 971 models

MT665D (A)MT755C (B)Median Agricultural Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT665DChallenger MT755CDifference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT665DMT755C—
CategoryAgriculturalAgriculturalSame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT665DChallenger MT755CDifference
ManufacturerSisu DieselCaterpillar—
ModelNot recordedC9 ACERT—
Power Output299hp301hp▲ MT755C+2 hp · <1%
Rated RPM2,100RPM2,100RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement514ci537ci▲ MT755C+23 ci · +4%
Bore4.4in4.4inSame
Stroke5.7in5.9in▲ MT755C+0.2 in · +4%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT665DChallenger MT755CDifference
TypeContinuously Variable TransmissionFull power shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT665DChallenger MT755CDifference
Length216in233in▲ MT755C+17 in · +8%
WidthNot recorded133in—
Height141in136in▲ MT665D+5 in · +4%
Operating Weight25,365lb30,195lb▲ MT755C+4,830 lb · +19%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT665DChallenger MT755CDifference
System TypeClosed Center Load Sensing (CCLS)Closed center pressure-flow compensated—
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerSpeed sensitive differential—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT665DChallenger MT755CDifference
Hitch CategoryIIIIII/IIIN—
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT665DChallenger MT755CDifference
Chassis Type4WDCrawler—
Drive Type4 Wheel DriveNot recorded—
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerSpeed sensitive differential—
Brake TypeNot recordedHydraulic wet disc—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT665DChallenger MT755CDifference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT665DChallenger MT755CDifference
TypeCabCabSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 110 hp
A · 93rd percentile (299 hp)B · 94th percentile (301 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 336 ci
A · 88th percentile (514 ci)B · 89th percentile (537 ci)

Cylinders

median 5.5
A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)

Operating Weight

median 10,914 lb
A · 92nd percentile (25,365 lb)B · 94th percentile (30,195 lb)

Length

median 173 in
A · 88th percentile (216 in)B · 93rd percentile (233 in)
A · MT665DB · MT755CMedian Agricultural Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT665DFull spec pageChallenger MT755C