Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT665E
Agricultural
- power
- 290 hp
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT665E vs Fendt 936
FendtModel B
Fendt 936
Agricultural
- power
- 315 hp
- displacement
- 551 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT665E
vs
FendtFendt 936
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ 936 higher · +25 hp (+9%)MT665E290 hp
936315 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT665E is in the 93rd percentile; 936 is in the 94th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 936 higher · +38 ci (+7%)MT665E513 ci
936551 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT665E is in the 88th percentile; 936 is in the 91st · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT665E6
9366
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT665E is in the 74th percentile; 936 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ 936 higher · +3,705 lb (+15%)MT665E24,670 lb
93628,375 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT665E is in the 91st percentile; 936 is in the 94th · 971 models
MT665E (A)936 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT665E | Fendt 936 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Fendt | — |
| Model | MT665E | 936 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT665E | Fendt 936 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO POWER | MAN Diesel | — |
| Power Output | 290hp | 315hp | ▲ 936+25 hp · +9% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 1,700RPM | ▲ MT665E+400 RPM · +24% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 513ci | 551ci | ▲ 936+38 ci · +7% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.5in | ▲ 936+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 5.7in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT665E | Fendt 936 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) | CVT (stepless Vario with a combination of mechanical and hydrostatic sections) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT665E | Fendt 936 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 219in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 109in | — |
| Height | 141in | 131in | ▲ MT665E+10 in · +8% |
| Wheelbase | 122in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 24,670lb | 28,375lb | ▲ 936+3,705 lb · +15% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT665E | Fendt 936 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Load Sensing (CCLS) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger MT665E | Fendt 936 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed 1 | 999rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,065rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT665E | Fendt 936 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III/IVN | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT665E | Fendt 936 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT665E | Fendt 936 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | 4.7 KW Electric Starter | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 93rd percentile (290 hp)B · 94th percentile (315 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 88th percentile (513 ci)B · 91st percentile (551 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 91st percentile (24,670 lb)B · 94th percentile (28,375 lb)
Height
median 111 inA · 96th percentile (141 in)B · 91st percentile (131 in)
A · MT665EB · 936Median Agricultural Tractor