ChallengerModel A
Challenger 85C
Crawler
- power
- 355 hp
- displacement
- 629 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 85C vs Fendt 936
FendtModel B
Fendt 936
Agricultural
- power
- 315 hp
- displacement
- 551 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger 85C
vs
FendtFendt 936
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ 85C higher · +40 hp (+13%)85C355 hp
936315 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
85C is in the 72nd percentile; 936 is in the 66th · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 85C higher · +78 ci (+14%)85C629 ci
936551 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
85C is in the 67th percentile; 936 is in the 64th · 191 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied85C6
9366
Median Crawler Tractor6
85C is in the 50th percentile; 936 is in the 50th · 192 models
Operating Weight
▲ 85C higher · +5,270 lb (+19%)85C33,645 lb
93628,375 lb
Median Crawler Tractor23,320 lb
85C is in the 70th percentile; 936 is in the 64th · 173 models
85C (A)936 (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 85C | Fendt 936 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Fendt | — |
| Model | 85C | 936 | — |
| Category | Crawler | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 85C | Fendt 936 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | MAN Diesel | — |
| Model | 3176 ATAAC | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 355hp | 315hp | ▲ 85C+40 hp · +13% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 1,700RPM | ▲ 85C+400 RPM · +24% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 629ci | 551ci | ▲ 85C+78 ci · +14% |
| Bore | 4.9in | 4.5in | ▲ 85C+0.4 in · +9% |
| Stroke | 5.5in | 5.7in | ▲ 936+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 85C | Fendt 936 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | CVT (stepless Vario with a combination of mechanical and hydrostatic sections) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 85C | Fendt 936 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 120in | 109in | ▲ 85C+11 in · +10% |
| Height | 128in | 131in | ▲ 936+3 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 33,645lb | 28,375lb | ▲ 85C+5,270 lb · +19% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 85C | Fendt 936 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 85C | Fendt 936 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | 4.7 KW Electric Starter | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 85C | Fendt 936 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 20gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 72nd percentile (355 hp)B · 66th percentile (315 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 67th percentile (629 ci)B · 64th percentile (551 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 70th percentile (33,645 lb)B · 64th percentile (28,375 lb)
Width
median 79.5 inA · 88th percentile (120 in)B · 82nd percentile (109 in)
A · 85CB · 936Median Crawler Tractor