ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT675D
Agricultural
- power
- 328 hp
- displacement
- 514 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT675D vs Ford 946
ChallengerChallenger MT675D
vs
FordFord 946
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ MT675D higher · +3 hp (<1%)MT675D328 hp
946325 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT675D is in the 95th percentile; 946 is in the 95th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 946 higher · +341 ci (+66%)MT675D514 ci
946855 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT675D is in the 88th percentile; 946 is in the 97th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT675D6
9466
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT675D is in the 74th percentile; 946 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ 946 higher · +7,135 lb (+28%)MT675D25,365 lb
94632,500 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT675D is in the 92nd percentile; 946 is in the 96th · 971 models
MT675D (A)946 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT675D | Ford 946 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Ford | — |
| Model | MT675D | 946 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT675D | Ford 946 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Sisu Diesel (AGCO Power) | Cummins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | NTA-855-A325 | — |
| Power Output | 328hp | 325hp | ▲ MT675D+3 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 514ci | 855ci | ▲ 946+341 ci · +66% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 5.5in | ▲ 946+1.1 in · +25% |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 6in | ▲ 946+0.3 in · +5% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT675D | Ford 946 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously variable transmission (Techstar CVT) | Full Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT675D | Ford 946 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 216in | 260in | ▲ 946+44 in · +20% |
| Height | 141in | 131in | ▲ MT675D+10 in · +8% |
| Operating Weight | 25,365lb | 32,500lb | ▲ 946+7,135 lb · +28% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT675D | Ford 946 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center load sensing (CCLS) | Closed Center Load Sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger MT675D | Ford 946 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 480/80R46 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 480/80R46 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT675D | Ford 946 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category III Quick Hitch | III/IVN | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT675D | Ford 946 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4-Wheel drive | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT675D | Ford 946 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | 12V Electric | Electric Starter | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT675D | Ford 946 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 15.9gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT675D | Ford 946 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Cab | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 95th percentile (328 hp)B · 95th percentile (325 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 88th percentile (514 ci)B · 97th percentile (855 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 92nd percentile (25,365 lb)B · 96th percentile (32,500 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 88th percentile (216 in)B · 97th percentile (260 in)
A · MT675DB · 946Median Agricultural Tractor