Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT738
Crawler
- power
- 325 hp
- displacement
- 599 ci
- Cylinders
- 7
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger MT738 vs Challenger MT740
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT740
Articulated
- power
- 345 hp
- displacement
- 599 ci
- Cylinders
- 7
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT738
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT740
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ MT740 higher · +20 hp (+6%)MT738325 hp
MT740345 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
MT738 is in the 67th percentile; MT740 is in the 71st · 142 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedMT738599 ci
MT740599 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
MT738 is in the 66th percentile; MT740 is in the 66th · 191 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT7387
MT7407
Median Crawler Tractor6
MT738 is in the 97th percentile; MT740 is in the 97th · 192 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT738 higher · +160 lb (<1%)MT73836,050 lb
MT74035,890 lb
Median Crawler Tractor23,320 lb
MT738 is in the 77th percentile; MT740 is in the 77th · 173 models
MT738 (A)MT740 (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT738 | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | MT738 | MT740 | — |
| Category | Crawler | Articulated | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT738 | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | AGCO Power | — |
| Model | Power | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 325hp | 345hp | ▲ MT740+20 hp · +6% |
| Rated RPM | 1,701RPM | 1,700RPM | ▲ MT738+1 RPM · <1% |
| Cylinders | 7 | 7 | Same |
| Displacement | 599ci | 599ci | Same |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.4in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 5.7in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT738 | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | CVT, infinitely variable hydrostatic using variable-displacement pump and motors | CVT, Infinitely variable hydrostatic using variable-displacement pump and motors | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT738 | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | Not recorded | 88in | — |
| Operating Weight | 36,050lb | 35,890lb | ▲ MT738+160 lb · <1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT738 | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Load sensing | Load Sensing | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT738 | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | III/IVN | — |
| Hitch Category | III/IVN | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT738 | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Tracklayer-rubber tracked | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | Track | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT738 | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | 12 volt | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 67th percentile (325 hp)B · 71st percentile (345 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 66th percentile (599 ci)B · 66th percentile (599 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 97th percentile (7)B · 97th percentile (7)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 77th percentile (36,050 lb)B · 77th percentile (35,890 lb)
A · MT738B · MT740Median Crawler Tractor