ChallengerModel A
Challenger 75E
Agricultural
- power
- 340 hp
- displacement
- 629 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger 75E vs Challenger MT740
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT740
Articulated
- power
- 345 hp
- displacement
- 599 ci
- Cylinders
- 7
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger 75E
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT740
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ MT740 higher · +5 hp (+1%)75E340 hp
MT740345 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
75E is in the 96th percentile; MT740 is in the 96th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 75E higher · +30 ci (+5%)75E629 ci
MT740599 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
75E is in the 93rd percentile; MT740 is in the 92nd · 1,083 models
Cylinders
▲ MT740 higher · +1 (+17%)75E6
MT7407
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
75E is in the 74th percentile; MT740 is in the 98th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT740 higher · +1,090 lb (+3%)75E34,800 lb
MT74035,890 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
75E is in the 97th percentile; MT740 is in the 97th · 971 models
75E (A)MT740 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | 75E | MT740 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Articulated | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | AGCO Power | — |
| Power Output | 340hp | 345hp | ▲ MT740+5 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 1,700RPM | ▲ 75E+400 RPM · +24% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 7 | ▲ MT740+1 · +17% |
| Displacement | 629ci | 599ci | ▲ 75E+30 ci · +5% |
| Bore | 4.9in | 4.4in | ▲ 75E+0.5 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 5.5in | 5.7in | ▲ MT740+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | CVT, Infinitely variable hydrostatic using variable-displacement pump and motors | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | 25in | 88in | ▲ MT740+63 in · +252% |
| Operating Weight | 34,800lb | 35,890lb | ▲ MT740+1,090 lb · +3% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed | Load Sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | III/IVN | — |
| Hitch Category | III, IV | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | 12 volt | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 15gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 96th percentile (340 hp)B · 96th percentile (345 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 93rd percentile (629 ci)B · 92nd percentile (599 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 98th percentile (7)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 97th percentile (34,800 lb)B · 97th percentile (35,890 lb)
Width
median 79.5 inA · 1st percentile (25 in)B · 63rd percentile (88 in)
A · 75EB · MT740Median Agricultural Tractor