Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT738
Crawler
- power
- 325 hp
- displacement
- 599 ci
- Cylinders
- 7
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger MT738 vs Challenger MT765C
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT765C
Crawler
- power
- 321 hp
- displacement
- 537 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger MT738
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT765C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ MT738 higher · +4 hp (+1%)MT738325 hp
MT765C321 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
MT738 is in the 67th percentile; MT765C is in the 66th · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT738 higher · +62 ci (+12%)MT738599 ci
MT765C537 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
MT738 is in the 66th percentile; MT765C is in the 59th · 191 models
Cylinders
▲ MT738 higher · +1 (+17%)MT7387
MT765C6
Median Crawler Tractor6
MT738 is in the 97th percentile; MT765C is in the 50th · 192 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT738 higher · +4,965 lb (+16%)MT73836,050 lb
MT765C31,085 lb
Median Crawler Tractor23,320 lb
MT738 is in the 77th percentile; MT765C is in the 66th · 173 models
MT738 (A)MT765C (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT738 | Challenger MT765C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | MT738 | MT765C | — |
| Category | Crawler | Crawler, Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT738 | Challenger MT765C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | Power | C9 ACERT | — |
| Power Output | 325hp | 321hp | ▲ MT738+4 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 1,701RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ MT765C+399 RPM · +23% |
| Cylinders | 7 | 6 | ▲ MT738+1 · +17% |
| Displacement | 599ci | 537ci | ▲ MT738+62 ci · +12% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.4in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 5.9in | ▲ MT765C+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT738 | Challenger MT765C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | CVT, infinitely variable hydrostatic using variable-displacement pump and motors | 16-Speed Full Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT738 | Challenger MT765C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 233in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 133in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 136in | — |
| Operating Weight | 36,050lb | 31,085lb | ▲ MT738+4,965 lb · +16% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT738 | Challenger MT765C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Load sensing | Closed center pressure-flow compensated | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Electro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT738 | Challenger MT765C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | III/IVN | Category III/IIIN | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT738 | Challenger MT765C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Tracklayer-rubber tracked | Crawler | — |
| Drive Type | Track | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Electro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic Wet Disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT738 | Challenger MT765C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT738 | Challenger MT765C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 67th percentile (325 hp)B · 66th percentile (321 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 66th percentile (599 ci)B · 59th percentile (537 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 97th percentile (7)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 77th percentile (36,050 lb)B · 66th percentile (31,085 lb)
A · MT738B · MT765CMedian Crawler Tractor