Head to head · Agricultural

Challenger MT755B vs Challenger MT765C

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT755B

Agricultural

power
316 hp
displacement
537 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT755B specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT765C

Crawler

power
321 hp
displacement
537 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT765C specs
ChallengerChallenger MT755B
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT765C

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural

n = 4971,130

Engine Power

▲ MT765C higher · +5 hp (+2%)
MT755B316 hp
MT765C321 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp

MT755B is in the 95th percentile; MT765C is in the 95th · 1,028 models

Engine Displacement

= Effectively tied
MT755B537 ci
MT765C537 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci

MT755B is in the 89th percentile; MT765C is in the 89th · 1,083 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT755B6
MT765C6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5

MT755B is in the 74th percentile; MT765C is in the 74th · 1,130 models

Forward Gears

= Effectively tied
MT755B16
MT765C16
Median Agricultural Tractor16

MT755B is in the 50th percentile; MT765C is in the 50th · 972 models

MT755B (A)MT765C (B)Median Agricultural Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT755BChallenger MT765CDifference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT755BMT765C
CategoryAgriculturalCrawler, Agricultural

Engine

SpecChallenger MT755BChallenger MT765CDifference
ManufacturerCaterpillarCaterpillarSame
ModelC9 ACERT Tech Tier 3C9 ACERT
Power Output316hp321hpMT765C+5 hp · +2%
Rated RPM1,701RPM2,100RPMMT765C+399 RPM · +23%
Cylinders66Same
Displacement537ci537ciSame
Bore4.4in4.4inSame
Stroke5.9in5.9inSame

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT755BChallenger MT765CDifference
TypeFull power shift16-Speed Full Power Shift

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT755BChallenger MT765CDifference
Length233in233inSame
Width133in133inSame
Height136in136inSame
Operating Weight31,000lb31,085lbMT765C+85 lb · <1%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT755BChallenger MT765CDifference
System TypeClosed-center PFCClosed center pressure-flow compensated
Pump Flow Capacity44.5gpmNot recorded
Pressure2,734psiNot recorded
Steering TypeElectro-hydraulic powerElectro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT755BChallenger MT765CDifference
Hitch TypeStandard Cat.3/3NNot recorded
Hitch CategoryIIICategory III/IIIN
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded
Hitch Capacity16,000lbNot recorded

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT755BChallenger MT765CDifference
Chassis TypeNot recordedCrawler
Steering TypeElectro-hydraulic powerElectro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel
Brake TypeHydraulic wet discHydraulic Wet DiscSame

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT755BChallenger MT765CDifference
Battery Voltage12VNot recorded
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT755BChallenger MT765CDifference
TypeCabCabSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 110 hp
A · 95th percentile (316 hp)B · 95th percentile (321 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 336 ci
A · 89th percentile (537 ci)B · 89th percentile (537 ci)

Cylinders

median 5.5
A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 10,914 lb
A · 95th percentile (31,000 lb)B · 95th percentile (31,085 lb)
A · MT755BB · MT765CMedian Agricultural Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT755BFull spec pageChallenger MT765C