Head to head · Agricultural

Challenger MT755C vs Yanmar LX490

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT755C

Agricultural

power
301 hp
displacement
537 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT755C specs
Yanmar LX490 Tractor
YanmarModel B

Yanmar LX490

Sub-Compact

power
48.5 hp
displacement
122 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full LX490 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT755C
vs
YanmarYanmar LX490

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural

n = 497–1,130

Engine Power

▲ MT755C higher · +253 hp (+521%)
MT755C301 hp
LX49048.5 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp

MT755C is in the 94th percentile; LX490 is in the 8th · 1,028 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT755C higher · +415 ci (+340%)
MT755C537 ci
LX490122 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci

MT755C is in the 89th percentile; LX490 is in the 3rd · 1,083 models

Cylinders

▲ MT755C higher · +2 (+50%)
MT755C6
LX4904
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5

MT755C is in the 74th percentile; LX490 is in the 31st · 1,130 models

Operating Weight

▲ MT755C higher · +26,577 lb (+735%)
MT755C30,195 lb
LX4903,618 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb

MT755C is in the 94th percentile; LX490 is in the 3rd · 971 models

MT755C (A)LX490 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT755CYanmar LX490Difference
ManufacturerChallengerYanmar—
ModelMT755CLX490—
CategoryAgriculturalSub-Compact—

Engine

SpecChallenger MT755CYanmar LX490Difference
ManufacturerCaterpillarNot recorded—
ModelC9 ACERTNot recorded—
Power Output301hp48.5hp▲ MT755C+253 hp · +521%
Rated RPM2,100RPM2,600RPM▲ LX490+500 RPM · +24%
Cylinders64▲ MT755C+2 · +50%
Displacement537ci122ci▲ MT755C+415 ci · +340%
Bore4.4in3.5in▲ MT755C+0.9 in · +26%
Stroke5.9in3.6in▲ MT755C+2.3 in · +64%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT755CYanmar LX490Difference
TypeFull power shiftNot recorded—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT755CYanmar LX490Difference
Length233in124in▲ MT755C+109 in · +88%
Width133in83.4in▲ MT755C+49.6 in · +59%
Height136inNot recorded—
Operating Weight30,195lb3,618lb▲ MT755C+26,577 lb · +735%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT755CYanmar LX490Difference
System TypeClosed center pressure-flow compensatedOpen center—
Steering TypeSpeed sensitive differentialNot recorded—

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecChallenger MT755CYanmar LX490Difference
TypeNot recordedElectro-hydraulic independent—
Speed 1Not recorded540rpm—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT755CYanmar LX490Difference
Hitch TypeNot recordedThree-Point Hitch—
Hitch CategoryIII/IIINI—
Hitch PositionNot recordedRear—
Hitch CapacityNot recorded2,760lb—

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT755CYanmar LX490Difference
Chassis TypeCrawlerNot recorded—
Steering TypeSpeed sensitive differentialNot recorded—
Brake TypeHydraulic wet discNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT755CYanmar LX490Difference
Starter TypeElectricNot recorded—

Capacities

SpecChallenger MT755CYanmar LX490Difference
CoolantNot recorded1.5gal—

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT755CYanmar LX490Difference
TypeCabNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 110 hp
A · 94th percentile (301 hp)B · 8th percentile (48.5 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 336 ci
A · 89th percentile (537 ci)B · 3rd percentile (122 ci)

Cylinders

median 5.5
A · 74th percentile (6)B · 31st percentile (4)

Operating Weight

median 10,914 lb
A · 94th percentile (30,195 lb)B · 3rd percentile (3,618 lb)

Length

median 173 in
A · 93rd percentile (233 in)B · 8th percentile (124 in)
A · MT755CB · LX490Median Agricultural Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT755CFull spec pageYanmar LX490